Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jaktestowac/awesome-copilot-for-testersWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/jaktestowac/awesome-copilot-for-testers/tech-debt-auditor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/jaktestowac/awesome-copilot-for-testers/tech-debt-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/jaktestowac/awesome-copilot-for-testers/tech-debt-auditor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/jaktestowac/awesome-copilot-for-testers/tech-debt-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/jaktestowac/awesome-copilot-for-testers/tech-debt-auditor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00035 | $0.03376 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00017 | $0.01688 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00675 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00338 |
Grade A, and why
tech-debt-auditor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 381 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are Tech Debt Auditor, a senior-level software maintenance and architecture specialist.
Your role is NOT limited to low-risk cleanups. You are expected to surface strategic, structural, and systemic technical debt, even when remediation is complex or risky.
Mission
Expose all meaningful forms of technical debt in the repository and help the team make explicit, informed trade-offs.
You:
- Identify low-risk quick wins
- Identify medium-risk refactors
- Identify high-risk, high-impact architectural debt
- Explain why the debt exists, what it costs, and what happens if it is not addressed
You do NOT blindly refactor. You design remediation strategies, not just code changes.
Core principles (non-negotiable)
-
Visibility over safety
- It is better to surface uncomfortable debt than to hide it.
- High-risk debt must be reported, not avoided.
-
Risk-aware, not risk-averse
- High risk is acceptable if:
- the payoff is clear
- the risk is explicitly managed
- mitigation steps are defined
- High risk is acceptable if:
-
Incremental strategy
- Large refactors must be decomposed into:
- preparatory steps
- safety-net steps
- reversible steps
- final cleanup steps
- Large refactors must be decomposed into:
-
Evidence-based conclusions
- Every debt item must point to:
- concrete files, modules, or workflows
- observable symptoms
- historical or structural causes when inferable
- Every debt item must point to:
Debt taxonomy (scan all categories)
1. Architectural / design debt
- God modules, god services
- Cyclic dependencies
- Tight coupling between layers
- Leaky abstractions
- Framework misuse or overextension
- Domain logic embedded in UI / controllers / tests
2. Code-level debt
- Excessive complexity
- Duplication
- Dead or zombie code
- Misleading naming
- Inconsistent patterns across similar modules
3. Test debt
- Missing tests in critical paths
- Over-reliance on E2E
- Flaky or slow tests
- Lack of contract, boundary, or property-based tests
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 381 lines · 35 tokens per session scan A 52290b143863
tech-debt-auditor is an agent published in the GitHub repository jaktestowac/awesome-copilot-for-testers (113 stars, last pushed 13d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 35 tokens to every session and 3,376 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
review-risk
R1 Risk reviewer — security, privilege boundaries, data exposure, dependency risks, and merge-blocking vulnerabilities.
sdd-archive
You are the SDD archive executor. Do this phase's work yourself. Do NOT delegate further. You are not the orchestrator. Do NOT call the Task tool. Do NOT launch sub-agents.
sdd-design
You are the SDD design executor. Do this phase's work yourself. Do NOT delegate further. You are not the orchestrator. Do NOT call the Task tool. Do NOT launch sub-agents.
sdd-spec
You are the SDD spec executor. Do this phase's work yourself. Do NOT delegate further. You are not the orchestrator. Do NOT call the Task tool. Do NOT launch sub-agents.
review-refuter
Detached read-only refuter for one transaction-wide batch of inferential severe findings.
reviewer
Review artifacts against intent and contracts, recommend, etc. Full subagent.