Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/jamesjfoong/github-pr-review-mcp/code-qualitygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jamesjfoong/github-pr-review-mcpWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00025 | $0.00266 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00133 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00053 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00027 |
Grade A, and why
code-quality scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Code Quality Agent
Purpose: Ensures code follows project standards and best practices.
Responsibilities
- Verify code follows ESLint rules
- Check Prettier formatting
- Ensure naming conventions are followed
- Validate import organization
- Check for unused variables
- Verify error handling patterns
When to Use
Before committing code, when reviewing PRs, or when fixing code quality issues.
Key Rules
- Run
npm run validatebefore committing - Fix linting issues with
npm run lint:fix - Format code with
npm run format - Follow naming conventions (kebab-case files, PascalCase classes, camelCase functions)
- Organize imports: external → internal, sorted alphabetically
- Use 2 spaces indentation
- Double quotes for strings
- Semicolons required
- 80 character max line length
Validation Checklist
- TypeScript compiles without errors
- ESLint passes
- Prettier formatting applied
- No unused variables
- Proper error handling
- Naming conventions followed
- Imports organized correctly
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 44 lines · 25 tokens per session scan A bf24662408e6
code-quality is an agent published in the GitHub repository jamesjfoong/github-pr-review-mcp (1 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 25 tokens to every session and 266 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
dev
开发者（Developer）角色：负责代码实现、PR 创建与迭代、代码审查响应、 技术方案设计。监听 issues.assigned 事件，自动接收被指派的开发任务。.
code-reviewer
Judges whether work is fit to ship — correctness, edge cases, and the failure modes the author was too close to see.
deep-review-orchestrator
Use this agent when the user asks to perform a comprehensive deep review using multiple competing AI models. Trigger phrases include: 'perform a deep review with multiple perspectives' 'get competing reviews of these changes' 'conduct a thorough review using different models' 'review these changes with multiple LLMs'…
advocatus-diaboli
Constructive contrarian for rigorous assumption-testing, counterargument generation, Socratic questioning, and logical fallacy detection — steelmans opposing positions before challenging claims.
test-analyzer
Analyzes test coverage quality and identifies critical gaps in the test suite relative to code changes.
qa-reviewer
Deterministic reviewer persona for manual agent-dispatch checks.