Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to jamesjfoong/github-pr-review-mcp. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/jamesjfoong/github-pr-review-mcp/main/.cursor/agents/code-quality.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jamesjfoong/github-pr-review-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/jamesjfoong/github-pr-review-mcp/code-quality)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/jamesjfoong/github-pr-review-mcp/code-quality"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/jamesjfoong/github-pr-review-mcp/code-quality/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/jamesjfoong/github-pr-review-mcp/code-quality"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/jamesjfoong/github-pr-review-mcp/code-quality.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00025 | $0.00266 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00106 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00053 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00027 |
Grade A, and why
code-quality scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Code Quality Agent
Purpose: Ensures code follows project standards and best practices.
Responsibilities
- Verify code follows ESLint rules
- Check Prettier formatting
- Ensure naming conventions are followed
- Validate import organization
- Check for unused variables
- Verify error handling patterns
When to Use
Before committing code, when reviewing PRs, or when fixing code quality issues.
Key Rules
- Run
npm run validatebefore committing - Fix linting issues with
npm run lint:fix - Format code with
npm run format - Follow naming conventions (kebab-case files, PascalCase classes, camelCase functions)
- Organize imports: external → internal, sorted alphabetically
- Use 2 spaces indentation
- Double quotes for strings
- Semicolons required
- 80 character max line length
Validation Checklist
- TypeScript compiles without errors
- ESLint passes
- Prettier formatting applied
- No unused variables
- Proper error handling
- Naming conventions followed
- Imports organized correctly
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 44 lines · 25 tokens per session scan A bf24662408e6
code-quality is an agent published in the GitHub repository jamesjfoong/github-pr-review-mcp (1 stars, last pushed 9mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 25 tokens to every session and 266 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
code-quality compared with agents from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| code-qualityjamesjfoong/github-pr-review-mcp | Agent | 1 | 9mo ago | MIT | A | 25 | Claude Code, Cursor |
| code-revieweromgcarlo/fushiguro-mcp | Agent | 0 | 2mo ago | MIT | A | 30 | Claude Code |
| pr-comment-resolverfcakyon/claude-codex-settings | Agent | 1.2k | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 176 | Claude Code |
| senior-software-developerpjt222/agent-almanac | Agent | 43 | yesterday | MIT | A | 25 | Claude Code |
| skill-reviewerpjt222/agent-almanac | Agent | 43 | yesterday | MIT | A | 27 | Claude Code |
| adversarial-verifierpjt222/agent-almanac | Agent | 43 | yesterday | MIT | A | 51 | Claude Code |
| test-analyzerliatrio-labs/claude-code-gauntlet | Agent | 13 | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 15 | Claude Code |