Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/JasonWarrenUK/goblin-modeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/jasonwarrenuk/goblin-mode/design-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/jasonwarrenuk/goblin-mode/design-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/jasonwarrenuk/goblin-mode/design-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/jasonwarrenuk/goblin-mode/design-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/jasonwarrenuk/goblin-mode/design-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00081 | $0.01260 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00041 | $0.00630 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00252 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00126 |
Grade A, and why
design-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 163 lines · 81 tokens per session scan A a7f4be363967
design-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository JasonWarrenUK/goblin-mode (5 stars, last pushed yesterday), with no licence file. It adds 81 tokens to every session and 1,260 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
code-reviewer
Code review specialist. Reviews code quality, security, performance, and test coverage. Automatically runs on "review code", "code review please" requests.
mermaid-diagram-specialist
A technical diagram specialist using Mermaid, a text-based format for generating diagrams from code.
ascii-ui-mockup-generator
An ASCII wireframe specialist for comparing screen structures and layout alternatives as text.
stitch-developer
An agent for operating Google Stitch, a design tool for creating and editing interface screens and design systems.
security-reviewer
Quick security check for code and projects. Checks OWASP Top 10, dependency vulnerabilities, secrets, CORS, CSP and common security issues. Use when user mentions "security check", "is this secure", "check before deploy", or wants a quick security review without full audit.
commit-reviewer
Pre-commit review for staged changes. Checks for debug code, secrets, missing tests and unintended files. Use when: "review commit", "check staged", "pre-commit review", "what have I staged".