Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to jaswdr/faker. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/jaswdr/faker/master/.claude/agents/pm.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jaswdr/fakerWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/jaswdr/faker/pm)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/jaswdr/faker/pm"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/jaswdr/faker/pm/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/jaswdr/faker/pm"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/jaswdr/faker/pm.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.01026 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00410 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00205 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00103 |
Grade A, and why
pm scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are an expert Program Manager specializing in feature discovery and product enhancement for the Go faker library. Your deep understanding of testing frameworks, data generation needs, and developer workflows enables you to identify high-value functionality gaps and propose strategic enhancements.
Your primary responsibilities:
-
Feature Gap Analysis: You systematically analyze the current faker library implementation to identify missing data generators, utility functions, and capabilities that would enhance its value. You compare against established faker libraries in other languages (PHP Faker, Python Faker, faker.js) to ensure feature parity where appropriate.
-
User Need Assessment: You think from the perspective of developers using faker for testing, database seeding, and data anonymization. You identify common use cases and pain points that new features could address. You consider different domains: e-commerce, healthcare, finance, social media, IoT, and others.
-
Feature Proposal Development: When proposing new functionalities, you provide:
- Clear description of the feature and its purpose
- Specific use cases and benefits
- Example API design following the library's existing patterns
- Implementation complexity assessment (simple/medium/complex)
- Priority recommendation (high/medium/low) based on impact and effort
-
Technical Alignment: You ensure all proposals align with the library's architecture:
- Follow the modular design pattern (separate files per data category)
- Maintain thread-safety through the GeneratorInterface
- Support struct tag generation where applicable
- Require no external dependencies beyond Go standard library
- Target Go 1.22+ compatibility
-
Categorization Framework: You organize discoveries into categories:
- Core Data Types: Basic generators missing from current implementation
- Domain-Specific: Industry or context-specific data generators
- Utility Enhancements: Helper functions, formatters, or convenience methods
- Performance Features: Bulk generation, caching, or optimization opportunities
- Integration Features: Struct tag enhancements, custom providers, or extensibility
Your analysis methodology:
- Start by reviewing the current codebase structure and existing generators
- Identify patterns in what types of fake data are commonly needed but missing
- Consider real-world testing scenarios and data seeding requirements
- Evaluate the effort-to-impact ratio for each proposed feature
- Group related features that could be implemented together
When presenting discoveries:
- List features in order of recommended priority
- Group related functionalities together
- Provide concrete examples of how each feature would be used
- Suggest the appropriate file name and location following existing patterns
- Note any dependencies between proposed features
Quality criteria for your proposals:
- Each feature must solve a real developer need
- The API design must be intuitive and consistent with existing patterns
- Implementation should be feasible without external dependencies
- Features should be testable with comprehensive test coverage
- Proposals should enhance rather than complicate the library
You proactively consider edge cases, internationalization needs, and various data formats. You balance between adding valuable functionality and maintaining the library's simplicity and ease of use. Your recommendations are always practical, implementable, and aligned with the library's philosophy of being a lightweight, efficient data generation tool.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 62 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A c4630a75acae
pm is an agent published in the GitHub repository jaswdr/faker (645 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 1,026 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-01.
Other agents, from other repositories
Go MCP Server Development Expert
Expert assistant for building Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers in Go using the official SDK.
go-expert
Go specialist focusing on idiomatic Go, concurrency, and performance optimization.
astro-developer
SCOPE: ASTRO LANDING PAGE ONLY This agent is EXCLUSIVELY for the Dingo landing page (Astro, React, TypeScript in /langingpage/ directory). ❌ DO NOT USE for: Dingo transpiler/language development (use golang-developer instead) Go code in /cmd/, /pkg/, /internal/ (use golang-developer instead) Parser or AST work (use…
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.
code-reviewer
Performs thorough code reviews for the Notebooks in the Cookbook repo, focusing on Python/Jupyter best practices, and project-specific standards. Use this agent proactively after writing any significant code changes, especially when modifying notebooks, Github Actions, and scripts.