Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/javierfajardo85-rgb/aiaam-xyzWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/javierfajardo85-rgb/aiaam-xyz/code-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/javierfajardo85-rgb/aiaam-xyz/code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/javierfajardo85-rgb/aiaam-xyz/code-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/javierfajardo85-rgb/aiaam-xyz/code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/javierfajardo85-rgb/aiaam-xyz/code-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00003 | $0.00231 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00115 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00001 | $0.00046 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00023 |
Grade A, and why
code-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 33 lines · 3 tokens per session scan A e4deaec4d5e3
code-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository javierfajardo85-rgb/aiaam-xyz (0 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 3 tokens to every session and 231 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
developer
Pragmatic senior developer. Reviews technical correctness, robustness, API contracts, external integrations, observability, and application performance.
Judge API Design
Evaluates API design for RESTful conventions, naming consistency, proper HTTP status codes, versioning, pagination, error contract consistency, and backward compatibility.
Judge Backwards Compatibility
Evaluates code for breaking changes, API versioning strategy, deprecation practices, and migration path planning that affect consumers and integrators.
Judge Rate Limiting
Evaluates code for API rate limiting, request throttling, backoff strategies, quota management, and protection against abuse and resource exhaustion.
Judge API Contract Conformance
Evaluates API endpoint implementations for contract conformance: input validation, proper status codes, error handling, rate limiting, versioning, and content-type management.
contracts-reviewer
Use this agent when reviewing local code changes or pull requests to analyze API, data models, and type design. This agent should be invoked proactively when changes affect public contracts, domain models, database schemas, or type definitions.