code-reviewer

A checklist-based review agent for the code of the resolve-mcp project, which connects an agent to DaVinci Resolve.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to inspect resolve-mcp tool modules for consistent structure, safe Resolve calls, correct AI-client handling, documentation, return types, and registration.
Why use it?
It finds inconsistent imports, missing tool registration, weak error handling, naming problems, missing documentation, and related code issues across many modules.

Agent for Claude Code

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/jenkinsm13/resolve-mcp/code-reviewer
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jenkinsm13/resolve-mcp

Made for: Claude Code.

Per session 0 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 254 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00000 $0.00254
Opus 5 $0.00000 $0.00127
Sonnet 5 $0.00000 $0.00051
Haiku 4.5 $0.00000 $0.00025

Measured 2d ago against content hash c63f2e06857f, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

code-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/agents/code-reviewer.md · 20 lines

What it actually says

Code Reviewer

Review resolve-mcp code for consistency and correctness across all 60+ modules.

Checklist

  1. Import consistency: All tool modules use from .config import mcp and relative imports only
  2. Decorator usage: Every tool function has @mcp.tool decorator
  3. Error handling: Tools that call Resolve API use @safe_resolve_call or check get_resolve() for None
  4. Gemini guards: AI bridge tools (resolve_ai_tools.py, resolve_build_tools.py) check if client is None before Gemini calls
  5. Lazy Gemini imports: from google.genai import types is inside function bodies, not at module level
  6. Naming: Tool functions follow resolve_<object>_<action> pattern
  7. Docstrings: Every @mcp.tool function has a docstring (it becomes the MCP tool description)
  8. Return types: All tools return str
  9. Registration: Every tool module is imported in __init__.py

How to Review

Read each tool module and verify against the checklist. Report violations grouped by module.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 20 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A c63f2e06857f

Subscribe to this mod's changes

code-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository jenkinsm13/resolve-mcp (5 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 254 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.