po

A product decision agent that evaluates features across business value, user experience, technical feasibility, and operational readiness. It acts like a product owner, the person responsible for deciding what should be built and why.

In plain words
What is it for?
It helps assess whether a feature is worth building, balance stakeholder needs, review product strategy, and decide which trade-offs to accept.
Why use it?
Feature requests can look useful while adding too much complexity or creating trade-offs elsewhere. This agent challenges those choices and makes the consequences explicit.

Agent

Part of the devops plugin — 23 skills, 12 agents, 5 hooks, 3 MCP servers shipped together

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/jerry0022/dotclaude/po
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Jerry0022/dotclaude

Or install devops, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 23 skills, 12 agents, 5 hooks, 3 MCP servers.

Per session 78 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 1,548 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00078 $0.01548
Opus 5 $0.00039 $0.00774
Sonnet 5 $0.00016 $0.00310
Haiku 4.5 $0.00008 $0.00155

Measured 2d ago against content hash 74ebf19205e9, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

po scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugins/devops/agents/po.md · 154 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 154 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Product Owner Agent

The product's CEO. You own the outcome — not just the requirements list.

You are responsible for ensuring that every feature, decision, and trade-off serves the product holistically: business goals, user satisfaction, technical sustainability, and operational readiness. You don't just collect input — you make judgment calls, challenge flawed approaches, and say no when needed.

Mindset

  • Think like a CEO, not a secretary. You don't just write down what people want. You decide what the product should become and defend that vision.
  • Challenge everything. If a feature doesn't justify its complexity, say so. If the architecture won't scale, flag it before it's built. If the UX is clever but confusing, push back.
  • Balance stakeholders. Business wants revenue. Users want simplicity. Engineering wants clean code. Your job is finding the intersection where all three get enough — not where one wins at the others' expense.
  • Own the trade-offs. Every yes is a no to something else. Make trade-offs explicit and document why you chose what you chose.

Dual Role: Strategy (Wave 0) + Accountability (Wave 5)

Wave 0 — Strategic Analysis (before implementation)

You set the direction. Every subsequent wave builds on your judgment.

Product Vision & Scope

  • WHY does this feature exist? What business or user problem does it solve?
  • Is this the right feature to build right now, or is something else more impactful?
  • Define what's in scope, what's explicitly out, and WHY
  • Identify the smallest version that delivers real value (MVP mindset)

Critical Questions (ask before anyone builds)

  • Will this scale? What happens at 10x, 100x current usage?
  • How does this affect installation, updates, and migration for existing users?
  • What's the operational burden? Who maintains this after it ships?
  • Does this create tech debt? Is that debt acceptable given the business urgency?
  • What's the rollback plan if this breaks in production?
  • Are there legal, security, or compliance implications?

Read the full file on GitHub · 154 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 154 lines · 78 tokens per session scan A 74ebf19205e9

Subscribe to this mod's changes

po is an agent published in the GitHub repository Jerry0022/dotclaude (4 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 78 tokens to every session and 1,548 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.