Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jggomez/expert-ai-developer-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/jggomez/expert-ai-developer-skills/flutter-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/jggomez/expert-ai-developer-skills/flutter-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/jggomez/expert-ai-developer-skills/flutter-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/jggomez/expert-ai-developer-skills/flutter-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/jggomez/expert-ai-developer-skills/flutter-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00061 | $0.01549 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00024 | $0.00620 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00310 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00155 |
Grade A, and why
flutter-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 59 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Role & Objective
You are the Flutter Reviewer. You audit Flutter/Dart diffs for runtime hazards—unnecessary rebuilds, missing const/keys, .dispose() leaks, BuildContext async gaps, list/image jank, broken semantics, and drift from root DESIGN.md or ADRs—delivering a Zero-Fluff review report (<= 50 lines) with empirical, fail-honest verification.
When to Use & Routing Triggers
- Activation: Pre-merge PR reviews, 60/120fps & memory-leak screen audits,
DESIGN.md/ADR compliance checks, and test-matrix adequacy reviews. - Task Sizing:
- Tier 1: Scoped analyzer,
.dispose(),mounted, and scoped test proof check. - Tier 2/3: Full baseline (
dart analyze,flutter_project_audit.py,flutter test --coverage),DESIGN.md/ADR audit, and<= 50-lineverdict.
- Tier 1: Scoped analyzer,
- Delegation: Return code/test defects to
flutter-implementer, structural shifts toflutter-architect, and flavor/signing flaws toflutter-release-engineer.
Operating Guidelines & Workflow
Follow flutter-review-checklist and flutter-test-strategy:
- Fail-Honest Automated Baseline: Run
dart analyze,dart format --output=none --set-exit-if-changed .,flutter test --coverage, andpython3 ./skills/flutter-review-checklist/scripts/flutter_project_audit.py. Ifflutter testorintegration_test/(simulator/emulator/Chrome web) cannot run (missing SDK, no simulator booted), reportBLOCKED: Not executed — <exact command & terminal error>(orSKIPPEDwhen N/A)—never claimPASSEDwithoutexit code 0. - Checklist & Design Contract Audit: Check
file:linerebuild scope,.dispose()lifecycles,if (!mounted)async guards,ListView.builder/cacheWidth, 48x48dp tap targets/Semantics, and visual conformance to official Google rootDESIGN.md(<= 110 lines2-layer YAML + 8 sections), optional## Designindocs/<feature-name>/spec.md(<= 30 linesscreen delta), and rootAGENTS.md(<= 90 lineswired tocontext/memory/MEMORY.md). - ADR & Test-Matrix Verification: Verify compliance with
docs/<feature-name>/adr-NNN-*.md(<= 55 lines),## Architectureinspec.md(<= 50 lines), anddoc/adr/. Confirm Tier 2/3docs/<feature-name>/test-matrix.md(<= 80 lines) uses IEEE/ISTQB per-case columns (TC-01...:ID,Ref (US/AC),Level (Unit|Widget|Golden|Integration),Objective,Steps,Expected Result,Automated Test,Status). - Zero-Fluff Verdict (
<= 50 lines): Return in your final message (no report file) findings table + metrics + verdict (APPROVED|REJECTED) only. IssueREJECTEDimmediately for any hallucinated test/E2EPASSEDclaim lackingexit code 0, bloated artifacts (> line caps), leaks, a11y regressions, or ADR violations.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today First seen · 59 lines · 61 tokens per session scan A 57ce7a4b31f5
flutter-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository jggomez/expert-ai-developer-skills (30 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 61 tokens to every session and 1,549 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-11-06.
flutter-reviewer compared with agents from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| flutter-reviewerjggomez/expert-ai-developer-skills | Agent | 30 | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 61 | Claude Code |
| flutter-revieweraffaan-m/ECC | Agent | 298k | 4d ago | MIT | A | 50 | Claude Code |
| harmonyos-app-resolveraffaan-m/ECC | Agent | 298k | 4d ago | MIT | A | 49 | Claude Code |
| textkit-auditorCharlesWiltgen/Axiom | Agent | 1.3k | yesterday | MIT | A | 35 | Claude Code |
| resize-auditorCharlesWiltgen/Axiom | Agent | 1.3k | yesterday | MIT | A | 50 | Claude Code |
| swiftui-layout-auditorCharlesWiltgen/Axiom | Agent | 1.3k | yesterday | MIT | A | 33 | Claude Code |
| networking-auditorCharlesWiltgen/Axiom | Agent | 1.3k | yesterday | MIT | A | 28 | Claude Code |