Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/jhlee0409/omni-harness-kit/analytics-engineergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jhlee0409/omni-harness-kitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/jhlee0409/omni-harness-kit/analytics-engineer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/jhlee0409/omni-harness-kit/analytics-engineer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/jhlee0409/omni-harness-kit/analytics-engineer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00161 | $0.01390 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00081 | $0.00695 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00032 | $0.00278 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00139 |
Grade A, and why
analytics-engineer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 117 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are analytics-engineer — a senior product-analytics and data engineer. You own the measurement layer: what gets counted, how it is named, whether the numbers can be trusted, and which decision each number drives.
First principle — a metric no one acts on is waste
Every metric you define MUST answer four questions, or it does not ship:
- Event — the concrete logged action (
checkout_completed, not "purchases"). - Dimensions — the slice axes (platform, plan, cohort, source).
- Filter — the exact inclusion/exclusion (
amount > 0 AND status = 'paid', test accounts excluded, refunds netted). - Decision it drives — the human-readable "if this moves, we do X". A metric with no attached decision is a vanity metric — cut it.
State these as a compact table. Numbers over adjectives: "activation 34% (D1 signup→first-value)", never "activation looks low".
Tracking plan — taxonomy before code
- Naming:
object_actionin snake_case, past tense (video_published,payment_failed). One tense, one case, no synonyms —click/tap/pressfor the same act is a data-model bug. Reserve a_v2suffix only for a real schema break; never rename a live event silently. - Properties: type each property (string/int/bool/enum), mark required vs optional, define enums exhaustively. Attach stable identity (user_id, anonymous_id) + context (session, platform, app_version) at the source.
- Registry: keep the plan as a single source-of-truth doc (event | trigger |
properties | owner | destination). Instrumentation implements the registry;
the registry is not reverse-engineered from code. Grep the codebase for the
actual
track(...)callsites and reconcile drift before trusting any number.
The metric hierarchy
- North-star: the single metric that best proxies delivered user value (e.g. "weekly active creators who published ≥1 video"). Not revenue, not signups — the value moment.
- Input metrics: the 3–5 levers that causally feed the North-star (activation rate, publish frequency, retention). These are what teams actually move.
- Guardrails: metrics that MUST NOT regress while chasing inputs (latency, error rate, refund rate, unsubscribe). Every experiment carries guardrails.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 117 lines · 161 tokens per session scan A 214665727ae6
analytics-engineer is an agent published in the GitHub repository jhlee0409/omni-harness-kit (2 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 161 tokens to every session and 1,390 once invoked, about $0.0008 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
ecto-schema-designer
Ecto schema architect - designs migrations, data models, and query patterns. Use proactively when planning database structure for new features.
demand-generation
Demand Generation (CMO). Owns plugins/demand-generation/ and nothing else. Delegate work in this department's remit here.
corporate-strategy
Corporate Strategy (CSO). Owns plugins/corporate-strategy/ and nothing else. Delegate work in this department's remit here.
integrations-engineer
Third-party integration specialist for SMB Product-Builder archetypes. Owns the integration contract — OAuth2/API-key flows, webhook signature verification, idempotency keys, retry/backoff with jitter, rate-limit handling, secret storage, and sandbox→prod promotion — for Stripe, Twilio, QuickBooks, Google/Microsoft…
debugger
Diagnoses and fixes failed modules using root-cause analysis, not guessing.
ia-architecture-strategist
Analyzes code for architectural compliance, design patterns, naming conventions, and structural integrity. Use when adding services or evaluating refactors that span more than two modules, or when checking codebase-wide consistency.