Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jiamaozheng/awesome-claude-codeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/jiamaozheng/awesome-claude-code/gem-implementer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/jiamaozheng/awesome-claude-code/gem-implementer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/jiamaozheng/awesome-claude-code/gem-implementer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/jiamaozheng/awesome-claude-code/gem-implementer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/jiamaozheng/awesome-claude-code/gem-implementer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00022 | $0.01120 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00560 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00224 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00112 |
Grade A, and why
gem-implementer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 114 lines · 22 tokens per session scan A 14974cedf623
gem-implementer is an agent published in the GitHub repository jiamaozheng/awesome-claude-code (1 stars, last pushed yesterday), with no licence file. It adds 22 tokens to every session and 1,120 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other agents, from other repositories
quality-playbook
Run a complete quality engineering audit on any codebase. Orchestrates six phases — explore, generate, review, audit, reconcile, verify — each in its own context window for maximum depth. Then runs iteration strategies to find even more bugs. Finds the 35% of real defects that structural code review alone cannot catch.
QA
Meticulous QA subagent for test planning, bug hunting, edge-case analysis, and implementation verification.
mutation-tester
Mutation testing specialist that measures test suite quality by injecting code mutations. Supports Stryker (JS/TS), mutmut (Python), go-mutesting (Go). Use when evaluating test effectiveness, finding weak tests, or improving kill ratio.
qa-implementer
TDD implementation worker. Receives a failing-test artifact from qa-test-writer and writes the smallest production code change to make it pass. Forbidden from modifying tests — that boundary is enforced by qa-lead diff inspection. Half of the adversarial fix pair.
qa-test-writer
TDD test-author worker. Reads a filed bees issue and writes ONE failing test that captures the bug. Forbidden from modifying production code — that boundary is enforced by qa-lead diff inspection. Half of the adversarial fix pair.
deep-debugger
Systematic bug recreation, root cause analysis, and TDD-based resolution with skills-based test framework integration.