Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jikig-ai/soleurWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/jikig-ai/soleur/soleur-engineering-review-dhh-rails-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/jikig-ai/soleur/soleur-engineering-review-dhh-rails-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/jikig-ai/soleur/soleur-engineering-review-dhh-rails-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/jikig-ai/soleur/soleur-engineering-review-dhh-rails-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/jikig-ai/soleur/soleur-engineering-review-dhh-rails-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00058 | $0.00095 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00029 | $0.00048 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00019 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00010 |
Grade A, and why
soleur-engineering-review-dhh-rails-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 8 lines · 58 tokens per session scan A 1b49d40f3466
soleur-engineering-review-dhh-rails-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository jikig-ai/soleur (15 stars, last pushed today), with no licence file. It adds 58 tokens to every session and 95 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
rails-architect
Ruby on Rails 7+ architecture specialist. Validates controller/service/model layering, service object discipline, query object extraction, and fat-model avoidance. Dispatch when touching controllers, models, services, or queries.
code-reviewer
Code reviewer. Delegate only when the user explicitly starts an Octopus workflow.
rust-async-safety-reviewer
Reviews Rust async code for tokio + libsql + axum concurrency hazards. Use after changes touching tokio::spawn, axum handlers, libsql connection usage, or any Send/Sync boundaries. Read-only — produces findings, does not edit.
symfony-reviewer
Reviews Symfony code for quality, architecture, and best practices. Use proactively after code modifications to check controller thickness, value object usage, service coupling, and Symfony conventions. Triggers on code review, quality audit, or architecture check requests.
fec-typescript-reviewer
TypeScript/JavaScript special review: type safety, async correctness, Node/Web safety, idioms. Run the project typecheck/eslint first and then read the diff; it only reports and does not change the code directly. Suitable for .ts/.tsx/.js/.jsx changes or PR-level TS/JS reviews. Division of labor with…
review-rails
Rails conventions and architecture reviewer for PR audits. Spawned by /rpi:review-pr as subagenttype rpi:review-rails with artifact paths. Ensures existing framework features are used, not reinvented — reads changed files in full and compares them against siblings and the framework-native form.