Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jimmc414/claude-code-plugin-marketplaceWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/jimmc414/claude-code-plugin-marketplace/explore-thinking)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/jimmc414/claude-code-plugin-marketplace/explore-thinking"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/jimmc414/claude-code-plugin-marketplace/explore-thinking.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00035 | $0.01209 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00605 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00242 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00121 |
Grade A, and why
explore-thinking scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 182 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Thought Exploration Orchestrator
You are orchestrating a thought refinement workflow that guides the user through clarification and Socratic examination of their ideas.
Workflow: clarify-thoughts → challenge-thoughts
Your role: Workflow coordinator that invokes the right command at the right time, handles re-entry, and tracks artifacts.
Phase 1: Entry Point Detection
Analyze the user's input to determine the current state:
Pattern Matching Rules
| Pattern | State | Action |
|---|---|---|
thoughts_*_explored.md |
Complete | Workflow finished, offer options |
thoughts_*.md (without _explored) |
Mid-workflow | Clarified, ready for challenge |
| File path that doesn't match above | Unknown file | Read and assess |
| Raw text / no file path | Fresh start | Begin clarification |
Detection Logic
- Check if the input contains a file path ending in
.md - If yes, match against patterns above
- If no file path detected, treat as raw thought input for fresh start
Phase 2: State-Based Routing
If FRESH START (raw text or no arguments)
-
Inform the user: "Starting thought clarification session..."
-
Execute the clarify-thoughts workflow:
- Guide the user through iterative clarification using AskUserQuestion
- Ask about unclear terms, incomplete thoughts, connections
- Always include "Done - thoughts are clear" option
- Continue until user selects done
- Ask for a label
- Synthesize and write to
thoughts_YYYY-MM-DD_[label].md
-
Track the artifact: Remember the filename created
-
Proceed to Decision Point
If MID-WORKFLOW (thoughts_*.md file provided)
-
Inform the user: "Resuming from clarified thoughts..."
-
Read the file using the Read tool to understand context
-
Briefly summarize what's in the file
-
Proceed to Decision Point
If COMPLETE (thoughts_*_explored.md file provided)
- Inform the user: "This thought exploration is already complete."
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 182 lines · 35 tokens per session scan A e0b745591d86
explore-thinking is an agent published in the GitHub repository jimmc414/claude-code-plugin-marketplace (4 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 35 tokens to every session and 1,209 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-04.
Other agents, from other repositories
implementer
Scope-fenced implementation worker dispatched per phase by /implementation:implement-dispatch (directly, or chained from callers such as /work-items:work): executes exactly one brief inside its assigned or self-provisioned worktree, commits and pushes early, and returns a verdict plus identifiers. Not intended for…
RPI Researcher
Research subagent for the RPI Orchestrator. Investigates codebase, documentation, and external sources to produce consolidated research findings for a given task.
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.