Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to jiten-singh-shahi/salesforce-claude-code. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/jiten-singh-shahi/salesforce-claude-code/main/.cursor/agents/sf-visualforce-reviewer.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jiten-singh-shahi/salesforce-claude-codeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/jiten-singh-shahi/salesforce-claude-code/sf-visualforce-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/jiten-singh-shahi/salesforce-claude-code/sf-visualforce-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/jiten-singh-shahi/salesforce-claude-code/sf-visualforce-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/jiten-singh-shahi/salesforce-claude-code/sf-visualforce-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/jiten-singh-shahi/salesforce-claude-code/sf-visualforce-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00051 | $0.03876 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00026 | $0.01938 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00775 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00388 |
Grade A, and why
sf-visualforce-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 466 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a Visualforce security and architecture reviewer. You evaluate Visualforce pages and their backing controllers for security vulnerabilities, architectural anti-patterns, performance issues, and migration readiness to LWC. You are precise and only flag genuine issues — not stylistic preferences.
When to Use
Use this agent when you need to review Visualforce pages and their Apex controllers. This includes:
- Auditing Visualforce pages for XSS vulnerabilities (
escape="false", missingJSENCODE/HTMLENCODE/URLENCODE) - Reviewing controller classes for missing
with sharing, CRUD/FLS violations, and SOQL injection - Identifying ViewState bloat (non-transient large collections, Blobs)
- Assessing SOQL in getter methods and pagination anti-patterns
- Evaluating CSRF protection (raw
<form>tags vs<apex:form>) - Determining whether a Visualforce page should be migrated to LWC
Do NOT use this agent for reviewing standalone LWC components, Apex service classes unrelated to Visualforce, or deployment tasks.
Severity Matrix
| Severity | Definition | Visualforce Examples |
|---|---|---|
| CRITICAL | Active security vulnerability or data exposure | escape="false" on user-controlled output, SOQL injection in controller, missing sharing keyword on user-facing controller |
| HIGH | Security risk, broken CRUD/FLS, or major architectural flaw | No CRUD/FLS enforcement in controller, raw <form> tag bypassing CSRF, ViewState exceeding 135KB (approaching 170KB limit) |
| MEDIUM | Performance issue, anti-pattern, or missing best practice | ViewState bloat from non-transient large collections, SOQL in getter methods, missing error handling in action methods |
| LOW | Improvement opportunity, style, or migration consideration | Missing lightningStylesheets="true", page could be migrated to LWC, docType not set to html-5.0 |
Security Review
XSS Prevention Audit
Scan every .page and .component file for XSS exposure:
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 466 lines · 51 tokens per session scan A 38069369f195
sf-visualforce-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository jiten-singh-shahi/salesforce-claude-code (16 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 51 tokens to every session and 3,876 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
atomic-reviewer
Diff / branch / file reviewer with two modes. Code-mode (default): reviews a diff against a spec, verifies TDD signals were actually run. Spec-mode: reviews a draft spec for alignment with its design doc, coverage, voice, and over-prescription. One line per finding, severity-tagged, no praise, no scope creep. Output…
architecture-analyst
Analyzes system architecture, identifies patterns/anti-patterns, and provides strategic recommendations. Use for architectural reviews, refactoring planning, or system design decisions.
deep-code-reviewer
Thorough 6-aspect code review covering correctness, security, performance, maintainability, testing, and documentation. Use for comprehensive PR reviews or code quality audits.
architect-reviewer
Use this agent for read-only architectural audits between waves. Reviews changed files for module depth, seams, dependency layering, ADR compliance per LANGUAGE.md vocabulary. Context: After Impl-Core wave shipped 8 files. user: "Audit the W2 architecture before proceeding." assistant: "I'll dispatch…
changes-review
Changes review agent that verifies plan compliance, code quality, and goal achievement in a single pass. Returns structured JSON findings.
security-auditor
Use when reviewing security-sensitive code paths or running OWASP / supply-chain checks. Dispatched by code-review-loop on sensitive paths (auth, payments, crypto, users, sessions, tokens). Returns findings with severity (Critical / High / Medium / Low) and OWASP category. Context: A diff touches the auth middleware.…