Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Jiusi-pys/agent-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/jiusi-pys/agent-plugins/review-runtime)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/jiusi-pys/agent-plugins/review-runtime"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/jiusi-pys/agent-plugins/review-runtime/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/jiusi-pys/agent-plugins/review-runtime"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/jiusi-pys/agent-plugins/review-runtime.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00053 | $0.00392 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00021 | $0.00157 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00078 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00039 |
Grade A, and why
review-runtime scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · +3 lines ea8ea560f295
- 1mo ago First seen · 39 lines · 53 tokens per session scan A bbe016330ffb
review-runtime is an agent published in the GitHub repository Jiusi-pys/agent-plugins (0 stars, last pushed 16d ago), with no licence file. It adds 53 tokens to every session and 392 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
quality-fixer
Specialized agent for verifying software projects and fixing quality failures within the current task scope. Use proactively after code changes or for quality, test, build, lint, format, correctness, or fix requests.
arn-spark-spike-runner
This agent should be used when the arn-spark-spike skill needs to validate a specific technical risk by creating a minimal proof-of-concept, running it, and reporting whether the risk is validated, partially validated, or failed. Also applicable when a user needs to quickly test whether a specific technology…
doctrine-performance-optimizer
Read-only performance audit of Doctrine usage: N+1 queries, fetch modes, batch processing, missing indexes, and caching opportunities. Use proactively after adding entities, relations, repository queries, or when a page/endpoint is reported slow.
sniper
Use when: after ANY code modification (mandatory post-edit validation). Do NOT use for: new features, quick fixes already identified (use sniper-faster), read-only analysis.
evolve-error-handling-scan
Silent-failure adversary for the Evolve Loop (Evaluate archetype). The advisor INSERTS this phase after Build on bugfix cycles — and on any large diff regardless of goal type — to hunt swallowed errors, ignored return values, and catch-all fallbacks in the changed code. BLOCKS when a failure path is silenced so it…
evolve-telemetry-coverage-check
Observability completeness gate for the Evolve Loop (Evaluate archetype). The advisor INSERTS this phase after Build on cycles whose scout.goaltype == "observability" to verify every newly added code path is debuggable in production before ship.