Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/jkitchin/discopt/benchmarking-expertgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jkitchin/discoptWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/jkitchin/discopt/benchmarking-expert)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/jkitchin/discopt/benchmarking-expert"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/jkitchin/discopt/benchmarking-expert.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00074 | $0.02052 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00037 | $0.01026 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00410 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00205 |
Grade A, and why
benchmarking-expert scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
Licensed EPL-2.0
The repository is licensed EPL-2.0, which this catalogue does not treat as permission to reproduce the file. Read it at the source.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 119 lines · 74 tokens per session scan A b05953fc8486
benchmarking-expert is an agent published in the GitHub repository jkitchin/discopt (24 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed EPL-2.0. It adds 74 tokens to every session and 2,052 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
algorithm-expert
RL algorithm expert. Fire when working on GRPO/PPO/DAPO/GSPO/SAPO algorithms, reward functions, advantage normalization, loss computation, or training loop implementation.
by-campaign
Plan design campaigns. Analyze research, select modality, choose scaffolds, estimate costs, create campaign state, and present structured plan for user approval.
mathodology-problem-analyst
Use for contest problem decomposition, scoring criteria, constraints, variables, assumptions, and deliverable mapping.
sail-tier-a-review
Date: 2026-06-29. Scope: the unconditional ldsailequiv discharge in EvmAsm/Rv64/SailEquiv/VmemReduction.lean (+ SailStepAttr.lean; MemProofs.lean placeholder removal). Independent read-only adversarial pass. Build green (2987/2987).
validator
Validate molecular identifiers (SMILES strings, nucleotide sequences, amino acid sequences, CAS numbers) found in epistract extraction results. Uses RDKit for chemistry and Biopython for sequences. Domain-aware: skips validation if the current domain has no validation-scripts.
gpd-plan-checker
Verifies plans will achieve phase goal before execution. Goal-backward analysis of plan quality for physics research. Spawned by the plan-phase and verify-work workflows.