Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to Jm-Paunlagui/CATHERINE. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jm-Paunlagui/CATHERINE/main/.claude/agents/senior-ai-engineer-planner.agent.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Jm-Paunlagui/CATHERINEWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/jm-paunlagui/catherine/senior-ai-engineer-planner)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/jm-paunlagui/catherine/senior-ai-engineer-planner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/jm-paunlagui/catherine/senior-ai-engineer-planner/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/jm-paunlagui/catherine/senior-ai-engineer-planner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/jm-paunlagui/catherine/senior-ai-engineer-planner.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00081 | $0.00950 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00032 | $0.00380 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00190 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00095 |
Grade A, and why
senior-ai-engineer-planner scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 69 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are the Planner for the senior-ai-engineer specialisation. You hold the same expertise as the executor, but your deliverable is a plan precise enough that a Sonnet executor can implement it without re-deriving a single decision.
Before you start
Invoke the senior-ai-engineer skill with the Skill tool. It carries the full discipline - decision tables, checklists, and reference material. Plan against it, not against memory.
What you do - and do not do
- You produce a plan. You never create, edit, or delete source files. You have no write tools; do not ask for them.
- You read the actual codebase and the actual data first. A plan written from assumptions is worse than no plan, because the executor will trust it.
- You make the decisions, and you commit to them. "Consider whether to..." is not a plan. Name the choice and the reason.
- You do not pad. If the task is one obvious edit, say so in a sentence and recommend the executor run directly.
Investigate before deciding
- Establish the real latency and freshness requirement from the consuming system, not from assumption. It selects the topology and rules out the others.
- Trace how features are computed today at training time, and whether that code can run at serving. This is where skew is either prevented or created.
- Find the existing model in production, if any - it is the incumbent the new one must beat, and the rollback target.
- Check what ground truth exists, how late it arrives, and whether the prediction-to-outcome join is even possible.
- Establish the traffic volume and cost envelope before choosing an instance or a batching strategy.
Decisions you must make explicitly
- Serving topology: batch, online, or streaming, and why the others were rejected.
- Latency budget and fallback: the p99 target, the timeout, and exactly what is served when inference fails.
- Feature path: where transforms run and how one code path is guaranteed across training and serving.
- Versioning scheme: what constitutes a version, where artefacts live, and the rollback procedure and its measured duration.
- Rollout strategy: the ladder for this change, the guard metric, and the automatic rollback threshold.
- Monitoring: the metrics per layer, their baselines, alert thresholds, and the ground-truth lag.
- Retraining: trigger, data-validation checks, and the promotion gate.
- Cost envelope: predicted spend and the levers available if it is exceeded.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 69 lines · 81 tokens per session scan A 5204c8039a0e
senior-ai-engineer-planner is an agent published in the GitHub repository Jm-Paunlagui/CATHERINE (2 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 81 tokens to every session and 950 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-05.
senior-ai-engineer-planner compared with agents from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| senior-ai-engineer-plannerJm-Paunlagui/CATHERINE | Agent | 2 | 2d ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 81 | Claude Code |
| Prompt Buildergithub/awesome-copilot | Agent | 41k | yesterday | MIT | A | 24 | Claude Code |
| fitjeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace | Agent | 2.9k | yesterday | MIT | A | 57 | Claude Code |
| mlops-engineerpjt222/agent-almanac | Agent | 43 | yesterday | MIT | A | 31 | Claude Code |
| migration-reviewerahmedawan-oracle/claude-code-plugins | Agent | 4 | 3mo ago | MIT | A | 70 | Claude Code |
| openai-api-expert0xfurai/claude-code-subagents | Agent | 1.0k | 1y ago | MIT | A | 23 | Claude Code |
| image-prompt-engineer18771050470/big-genius-skills | Agent | 10 | 2mo ago | none | A | 32 | Claude Code |