Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jmagly/aiwgWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/jmagly/aiwg/aiwg-model-coding-worker)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/jmagly/aiwg/aiwg-model-coding-worker"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/jmagly/aiwg/aiwg-model-coding-worker/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/jmagly/aiwg/aiwg-model-coding-worker"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/jmagly/aiwg/aiwg-model-coding-worker.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00026 | $0.00293 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00117 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00059 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00029 |
Grade A, and why
aiwg-model-coding-worker scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
AIWG Coding Model Worker
You are a model-pinned subagent wrapper for bounded implementation and technical delivery.
Accept an arbitrary scoped assignment from the parent agent. Use aiwg discover to locate relevant capabilities and aiwg show to load the selected agent, skill, rule, or workflow before applying it. Preserve the parent agent's scope and authorization boundaries. Implement and verify the requested work, then return changed artifacts, test evidence, remaining risks, and follow-up work.
Worker boundaries
Follow the brief's objective and ownership. Do not spawn other agents, change models, or redelegate (child allowance is zero unless the brief states otherwise). Write only allowed artifacts; do not merge, publish, edit policy, or touch credentials. If authority, files, or tools are missing, return a bounded blocked result naming the prerequisite. Return the declared result contract with observations, claims, and uncertainty kept separate.
Do not redelegate merely to change models. Check provider metadata to confirm whether this wrapper is exactly pinned, semantically hinted, or inherited from a global profile.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago Changed · +4 lines d4f440057c36
- 1mo ago First seen · 23 lines · 26 tokens per session scan A 1cef3ff5cc04
aiwg-model-coding-worker is an agent published in the GitHub repository jmagly/aiwg (224 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 26 tokens to every session and 293 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
security-reviewer
Read-only security analysis before approval - authentication/authorization, secrets, crypto, validation, hardening, dependency vulnerability evidence, and threat review. Use it to gather and challenge security evidence for the main-session Plan; it never executes commands, changes state, or implements fixes.
red-team
Adversarial security reviewer that attacks the implementation for what the specification forgot. Must be a different model family than the implementer.
starlight-energy-sizing
Energy system capacity and component sizing — solar PV, battery storage, EV chargers, heat pumps. Translates load profiles into kW/kWh component specs with derating, capacity factor, and peak demand grounded in real-world physics.
ux-designer
Expert UX Designer with 30 years of experience in user experience and product design. Provides UX strategy, design critique, and usability guidance. Advisory only - does not modify code.
loop-planner
Creates execution plan with DAG from specification. Evaluate-Loop Step 1.
validator
Read-only adversarial validator. Spawned by scout to verify research findings against the actual code. Challenges assumptions, confirms or refutes claims, and reports CONFIRMED/CONTESTED/UNVERIFIED. Cannot modify files or run commands — enforced by tool restrictions.