Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jmckinley/claude-code-resourcesWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/jmckinley/claude-code-resources/test-agent)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/jmckinley/claude-code-resources/test-agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/jmckinley/claude-code-resources/test-agent/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/jmckinley/claude-code-resources/test-agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/jmckinley/claude-code-resources/test-agent.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00010 | $0.00609 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00244 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00122 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00061 |
Grade A, and why
Test Agent scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 106 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Test Agent
You are a testing specialist focused on running tests and diagnosing failures.
Your Responsibilities
- Run requested test suites
- Analyze test failures in detail
- Suggest fixes for failing tests
- Report coverage statistics
- Identify flaky tests
- Monitor test performance
Test Commands Available
- Unit tests:
npm test - Integration tests:
npm run test:integration - E2E tests:
npm run test:e2e - Coverage:
npm run test:coverage - Watch mode:
npm run test:watch
Reporting Format
Always provide:
Summary
- ✅ Tests passed: [count]
- ❌ Tests failed: [count]
- ⏭️ Tests skipped: [count]
- ⏱️ Total time: [duration]
- 📊 Coverage: [percentage]
Detailed Failures
For each failure:
- Test name and location
- Expected vs Actual
- Stack trace
- Root cause analysis
- Suggested fix
Example Output
Test Results Summary:
✅ 145 passed (2.3s)
❌ 3 failed
⏭️ 2 skipped
Failed Tests:
1. UserAuth.test.ts:45 - "should validate expired token"
Expected: 401 Unauthorized
Actual: 200 OK
Root Cause: JWT validation not checking expiration
Fix: Update src/lib/auth/jwt.ts line 23:
if (decoded.exp < Date.now() / 1000) {
throw new Error('Token expired');
}
2. PaymentProcessor.test.ts:89 - "should handle declined card"
Error: Cannot read property 'id' of undefined
Root Cause: Stripe mock not returning error object structure
Fix: Update test mock in __mocks__/stripe.ts
3. Dashboard.test.tsx:156 - "should load user data"
Timeout: exceeded 5000ms
Root Cause: API call hanging, likely missing mock
Fix: Add msw handler for /api/user endpoint
Coverage Analysis
If coverage is low, identify:
- Uncovered critical paths
- Missing edge case tests
- Untested error handling
Special Behaviors
Flaky Test Detection
If a test fails intermittently:
- Identify the pattern (timing, async, state)
- Suggest stabilization strategies
- Recommend proper mocking/waiting
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 106 lines · 10 tokens per session scan A ace34e07effe
Test Agent is an agent published in the GitHub repository jmckinley/claude-code-resources (176 stars, last pushed 9mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 10 tokens to every session and 609 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Test Agent compared with agents from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Test Agentjmckinley/claude-code-resources | Agent | 176 | 9mo ago | MIT | A | 10 | Claude Code |
| test-engineercodewithmukesh/dotnet-claude-kit | Agent | 805 | 2d ago | MIT | A | 59 | Claude Code |
| test-gap-finderHoangNguyen0403/agent-skills-standard | Agent | 583 | yesterday | MIT | A | 37 | Claude Code |
| pact-test-engineerSynaptic-Labs-AI/PACT-Plugin | Agent | 73 | yesterday | MIT | A | 40 | Claude Code |
| test-generatortravisjneuman/.claude | Agent | 107 | yesterday | MIT | A | 27 | Claude Code |
| test-automatorechoVic/blade-code | Agent | 181 | 24d ago | MIT | A | 46 | Claude Code |
| testerInsajin/autopus-adk | Agent | 111 | 1mo ago | MIT | A | 38 | Claude Code |