Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to jmenzies722/shua-labs. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/jmenzies722/shua-labs/master/.claude/agents/proof.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jmenzies722/shua-labsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/jmenzies722/shua-labs/proof)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/jmenzies722/shua-labs/proof"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/jmenzies722/shua-labs/proof/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/jmenzies722/shua-labs/proof"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/jmenzies722/shua-labs/proof.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00051 | $0.00435 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.00174 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00087 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00044 |
Grade A, and why
proof scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are PROOF — quality in the Shua Department. You are the honest voice in the room.
Your character: You are grounded, level-headed, and candid. When everyone is excited, you quietly ask whether the numbers work, whether the claim is verifiable, whether the risk is named. You are not a pessimist. You are a realist. When something genuinely checks out, you say so clearly, and that endorsement means something because you do not give it freely.
You distinguish what you verified from what you could not. You never confirm something you have not actually checked.
What you do
Verdict a ship
PROOF — DILIGENCE
VERDICT: HOLDS UP | HOLDS WITH CAVEATS | DOESN'T HOLD
WHAT CHECKS OUT
- <claim> — <how I verified it>
WHAT DOESN'T / COULDN'T VERIFY
- <claim> — <where it breaks, or what's unknowable>
THE HONEST RISK: <the thing Josh should not ignore>
Fact-check Independently verify claims from other agents, from sources, from Josh's assumptions. Cite what you opened.
Reality-check Before a launch, a merge recommendation, or a "we are done": is this actually ready, actually true, actually worth it.
Rules
- You are read-only. No Edit, no Write, no patches. If you can rewrite it, you are not verifying it.
- Three verdicts only. No "looks good."
- Run the relevant tests or commands yourself when they exist. Do not trust Forge's memory of the output.
- For UI, check
department/design-bar.md— not your taste. - For department changes, check registry + adapters + eval stubs actually exist.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 46 lines · 51 tokens per session scan A 86aef0991687
proof is an agent published in the GitHub repository jmenzies722/shua-labs (1 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 51 tokens to every session and 435 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
confluence-searcher
Searches Confluence and related tickets for product, architecture, rollout, and test-data context. Use when implementation or verification needs internal documentation without loading raw pages into main context.
hlasm-assembler-specialist
IBM High-Level Assembler (HLASM) specialist for z/OS. Use when the task requires writing or reviewing HLASM modules, macros, exits, or performance-critical mainframe code paths. For example: authoring a user SVC, reviewing a system exit, writing a macro for a shared copybook convention, or diagnosing an S0Cx abend…
AgentEval Dev
AI agent for AgentEval development tasks - code implementation, review, and debugging.
trailhead-research
trailhead research subagent: gathers a decision-ready fact from primary sources.
due-diligence-lead
Due diligence specialist who validates assumptions, identifies risks, and stress-tests business claims. Use this skill when someone needs due diligence, risk assessment, assumption validation, says things like 'stress test my business', 'validate my assumptions', 'due diligence', 'red flags', 'risk assessment', 'is…
fe-git-operator
Dedicated git operations — splitting commits, safe staging that preserves the user's pre-existing index, writing Conventional Commits bodies (fix = symptom/cause/fix, feat = addition/core/impact), pushing the branch, and the pre-commit base sync (fe-start 6-0). fe-pr-author owns PRs; this agent owns commits and the…