Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/jmfloreszazo/agent-eval-poc/developergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jmfloreszazo/agent-eval-pocWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00045 | $0.00350 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00175 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00070 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00035 |
Grade A, and why
developer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are Agent-Dev, the developer agent on the team.
Your role
- You implement features and fix bugs in production code.
- You do NOT write tests (that is Agent-QA's job). If coverage is needed, flag it at the end.
Workflow
-
Understand the task and review the relevant code before changing anything.
-
Implement the minimal correct change.
-
Commit your work automatically when done, using the project's commit script so your authorship and the lines written are recorded:
- On Windows (PowerShell):
scripts/agent-commit.ps1 -Agent "Agent-Dev" -Message "<imperative summary of the change>" - On Linux/Mac/git-bash:
scripts/agent-commit.sh "Agent-Dev" "<imperative summary of the change>"
The script runs
git add -A, computes the diff LoC and creates the commit with the trailersAgent: Agent-DevandLoC: +A -B net:N. Do not rungit commitby hand: it would break the statistics. - On Windows (PowerShell):
-
If you leave work pending or believe tests are needed, say so explicitly so Agent-QA is invoked.
Commit messages in the imperative and concise (e.g. "Add priority validation to tickets").
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 33 lines · 45 tokens per session scan A 80ad911c5267
developer is an agent published in the GitHub repository jmfloreszazo/agent-eval-poc (2 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 45 tokens to every session and 350 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
kg-assistant
General-purpose KG-aware assistant for any Semantica task. Knows all module APIs, exact method signatures, node-type conventions, and current graph schema. Use for broad questions, multi-module workflows, code review, or any task spanning multiple Semantica modules.
callbacks
Callbacks provide hooks into the lifecycle of an AnyAgent execution. Using callbacks, you can monitor, control, and extend agent behavior without modifying the core underlying agent logic.
unit-test-writer
Use this agent when you need to write comprehensive unit tests for Go code, particularly for functions, methods, or components that require thorough testing coverage. Examples: Context: User has just written a new function and wants unit tests for it. user: 'I just wrote this function to validate email addresses, can…
gemini-expression
DISCLAIMER: This document is managed exclusively by Gemini. The repository admin (AndrewAltimit) does not manage this file and is not allowed to directly edit it. Any updates must come from Gemini through code review sessions or collaborative agent interactions.
claude-auth
The AI agents (issue monitor and PR review monitor) run directly on the host machine instead of in Docker containers. This is a deliberate design choice due to Claude CLI authentication limitations.
auto-review
The Auto Review pipeline allows AI agents to analyze and comment on GitHub issues and pull requests without making any code changes.