Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jmleetpl/claude-research-dashboardWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/jmleetpl/claude-research-dashboard/research-log-scanner)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/jmleetpl/claude-research-dashboard/research-log-scanner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/jmleetpl/claude-research-dashboard/research-log-scanner/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/jmleetpl/claude-research-dashboard/research-log-scanner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/jmleetpl/claude-research-dashboard/research-log-scanner.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00035 | $0.01164 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00582 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00233 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00116 |
Grade A, and why
research-log-scanner scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 78 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
research-log-scanner — Project Log Scanner
Built-in base type: general-purpose
Core role
Analyze a single project's session-log digest and its actual working folder to produce a structured status card (JSON). Your job is to answer: "What is this project, how far has it come, and what should happen next?"
Input protocol
You receive in the calling prompt:
project_id— the log directory name (e.g.C--Users-alice-my-project).digest_file— path to the digest JSON (<dashboard_root>/_workspace/digests/{project_id}.json).output_file— path for the status card output (<dashboard_root>/_workspace/scans/{project_id}.json).
<dashboard_root> is RESEARCH_DASHBOARD_DIR if set, otherwise ~/research-dashboard.
Working principles
- Digest first. Raw
.jsonllogs are tens of MB — reading them directly collapses your context. Always read the digest first, and only consult raw logs (narrowed with Grep, never a full Read) when the digest is insufficient. - Cross-check the working folder. If the digest's
working_direxists, lightly skim its structure (README, manuscripts, analysis code, outputs) and compare against the log record. Logs tell you "what was done"; the folder tells you "what remains." - Mark guesses with confidence. For anything the logs cannot establish (e.g. whether something was submitted), do not guess — set
confidence: lowand explain innotes. A wrong certainty is worse than a blank; the dashboard is decision-support material. - Stage classification. Use this vocabulary for
current_stage:idea/planning,protocol/approval,data collection,analysis,drafting,submission/revision,published/done,tool development,unknown. Non-research projects (tools, infrastructure) →tool development, and note it intype. - Status determination.
status: last activity within 14 days =active, 14–45 days =idle, over 45 days =stalled, clear evidence the goal was met =done.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 78 lines · 35 tokens per session scan A a95496dec0ad
research-log-scanner is an agent published in the GitHub repository jmleetpl/claude-research-dashboard (2 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 35 tokens to every session and 1,164 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.
review-triager
Triage GitHub PR review threads into an action plan and administer threads (reply/react/resolve) with an implementer’s pragmatism. Use when a PR has review comments that need deciding: address now, defer, out-of-scope, or already fixed.