oh-my-githubcopilot: Agent for Claude Code

.github/agents/database-reviewer.agent.md

database-reviewer is an agent for Claude Code from jmstar85/oh-my-githubcopilot. It costs 41 tokens per session (1,854 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of database-reviewer, MIT.

A read-only reviewer for database code, including SQL queries, code that uses databases, and database structure changes called migrations.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review SQL, database libraries, migrations, indexes, transactions, and concurrent database operations.
Why use it?
It helps find unsafe queries, slow access patterns, connection leaks, transaction errors, and risky production changes before they cause data or service problems.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: user-invocable in frontmatter. Also seen: model in frontmatter.

This is jmstar85/oh-my-githubcopilot's own configuration. It tells Claude Code how to work on oh-my-githubcopilot itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything oh-my-githubcopilot configures →

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to jmstar85/oh-my-githubcopilot. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/jmstar85/oh-my-githubcopilot/main/.github/agents/database-reviewer.agent.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jmstar85/oh-my-githubcopilot

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for database-reviewer

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/jmstar85/oh-my-githubcopilot/database-reviewer/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/jmstar85/oh-my-githubcopilot/database-reviewer)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/jmstar85/oh-my-githubcopilot/database-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/jmstar85/oh-my-githubcopilot/database-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for database-reviewer

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/jmstar85/oh-my-githubcopilot/database-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/jmstar85/oh-my-githubcopilot/database-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 41 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 1,854 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin 91% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00041 $0.01854
Opus 5.5 $0.00016 $0.00742
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00008 $0.00371
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00185

Measured 1mo ago against content hash fe16e3f6ff1d, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

database-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

91% identical to database-reviewer — 4 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

.github/agents/database-reviewer.agent.md · 141 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 141 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Database Reviewer

Role

You are Database Reviewer. Your mission is to enforce query safety, performance correctness, transaction hygiene, and migration safety in SQL and ORM codebases.

Responsible for: SQL injection prevention, index coverage, N+1 detection, transaction boundaries, migration safety, connection lifecycle, query performance, and concurrency correctness.

Not responsible for: implementing fixes, architecture design, writing application tests, or capacity planning.

Why This Matters

Database bugs are uniquely dangerous: SQL injection can exfiltrate an entire database, N+1 queries silently destroy performance at scale, and botched migrations are irreversible in production. Connection leaks exhaust the pool under load, causing full application outages. Every issue here has happened in production — repeatedly.

Embedded Rules

SQL Injection — Non-Negotiable

  • CRITICAL: ALWAYS use parameterized queries or prepared statements. NEVER construct SQL by string concatenation or interpolation of user input. This applies equally to ORM raw-SQL methods (.whereRaw(), Session.execute()) — use bind parameters, never f-strings or + concatenation.
  • HIGH: Validate and sanitize inputs even with parameterization — defense in depth.
  • HIGH: Database accounts must have least privilege: SELECT/INSERT/UPDATE only; never DROP, ALTER, or GRANT in the application account.

Indexes

  • HIGH: Every foreign key column must have an index. Unindexed foreign keys cause full table scans on every JOIN or cascade delete. Always add: CREATE INDEX idx_<table>_<fk_col> ON <table>(<fk_col>);
  • HIGH: Check query execution plans (EXPLAIN ANALYZE in PostgreSQL, EXPLAIN in MySQL) for queries in hot paths. A sequential scan on a large table is a flag.
  • MEDIUM: Composite indexes: order columns by selectivity, matching the query's WHERE pattern (WHERE a = ? AND b = ? → index on (a, b)).\n- LOW: Partial indexes (WHERE deleted_at IS NULL) reduce index size for soft-delete patterns. Purge unused indexes — they waste write overhead.

Read the full file on GitHub · 141 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 141 lines · 41 tokens per session scan A fe16e3f6ff1d

Subscribe to this mod's changes

database-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository jmstar85/oh-my-githubcopilot (160 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 41 tokens to every session and 1,854 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 91% identical to database-reviewer, differing in 4 lines, and is treated as a copy.

Related

Other agents, from other repositories

review-triager

Triage GitHub PR review threads into an action plan and administer threads (reply/react/resolve) with an implementer’s pragmatism. Use when a PR has review comments that need deciding: address now, defer, out-of-scope, or already fixed.

prisma/orm · 0 tokens

review-implementer

Implements a PR’s review action list, commits in small logical steps, and resolves GitHub review threads with “Done” replies when finished. Use when review-actions.md exists for a PR.

prisma/orm · 44 tokens

core-data-auditor

Use this agent when the user mentions Core Data review, schema migration, production crashes, or data safety checking.

CharlesWiltgen/Axiom · 28 tokens

database-optimization-reviewer

Use when database performance is in question — query optimization, indexing strategy, query plans, schema/access-pattern tradeoffs, or "is this the fastest way to read/write this data". The DB performance specialist (distinct from database-reviewer, which owns migration correctness/reversibility). Verifies against the…

jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace · 71 tokens

database-reviewer

Use when reviewing schema changes, migrations, indexes, or query patterns — verifies reversibility, index strategy, and query-plan correctness against the db persona standards.

jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace · 35 tokens

data-engineer

Adversarial data and database engineer who assumes the design is mis-normalized and indexed for a workload that does not exist. Audits schemas, migrations, queries, ORM code, document shapes, stream contracts, and pipelines against normalization, dimensional modeling, key-value access patterns, columnar and…

testdouble/han · 216 tokens