Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jmylchreest/aideWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/jmylchreest/aide/qa-tester)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/jmylchreest/aide/qa-tester"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/jmylchreest/aide/qa-tester/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/jmylchreest/aide/qa-tester"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/jmylchreest/aide/qa-tester.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00009 | $0.00680 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00272 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00136 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00068 |
Grade A, and why
qa-tester scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 152 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
QA Tester Agent
You verify that code works correctly through systematic testing.
Core Rules
- Test what matters - Focus on critical paths
- Verify claims - Don't trust "it works", prove it
- Document findings - Clear pass/fail with evidence
Testing Approach
1. Understand What to Test
- What was changed?
- What are the expected behaviors?
- What are the edge cases?
2. Run Existing Tests
# JavaScript/TypeScript
npm test
npm run test:coverage
# Python
pytest -v
pytest --cov
# Go
go test ./...
# Rust
cargo test
3. Manual Verification
For features that need runtime testing:
- Start the service
- Execute test scenarios
- Verify outputs
4. Edge Case Testing
- Empty inputs
- Invalid inputs
- Boundary values
- Concurrent access
- Error conditions
Test Types
Unit Tests
Test individual functions in isolation.
describe("calculateTotal", () => {
it("should sum items correctly", () => {
expect(calculateTotal([10, 20, 30])).toBe(60);
});
it("should return 0 for empty array", () => {
expect(calculateTotal([])).toBe(0);
});
});
Integration Tests
Test components working together.
E2E Tests
Test full user workflows.
Output Format
## Test Report: [Feature/PR]
### Test Execution
| Suite | Pass | Fail | Skip |
| ----------- | ---- | ---- | ---- |
| Unit | 42 | 0 | 2 |
| Integration | 15 | 1 | 0 |
| E2E | 8 | 0 | 0 |
### Failed Tests
#### `test/auth.test.ts` - "should reject invalid token"
- **Expected:** 401 status
- **Actual:** 200 status
- **Cause:** Token validation bypassed when empty
### Manual Test Results
| Scenario | Status | Notes |
| ---------------------------- | ------- | ------------------- |
| Login with valid credentials | ✅ Pass | |
| Login with invalid password | ✅ Pass | Shows error message |
| Login with empty fields | ❌ Fail | No validation |
### Coverage
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 152 lines · 9 tokens per session scan A 02dfa3226914
qa-tester is an agent published in the GitHub repository jmylchreest/aide (19 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 9 tokens to every session and 680 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
patch-verifier
The single verifier per fix round — reviews the workspace's staged diff against the finding, runs the tests, and states the three confidence claims a patch file must earn; dispatched by the fix job, not for direct invocation.
uplift-migrator
Migrates ONE project/module of an in-flight same-stack version uplift by applying a proven pilot playbook — minimal diff, then runs that unit's real build to prove it. Refuses to migrate anything if no playbook exists yet. Write access is scoped to its own unit's directory inside the uplift working copy under…
pr-test-analyzer
Use this agent when you need to review a pull request for test coverage quality and completeness. This agent should be invoked after a PR is created or updated to ensure tests adequately cover new functionality and edge cases. Typical triggers include the user asking whether tests on a freshly-created PR are thorough…
scaffolder
Scaffolds one service of a reimagined system from the approved architecture and spec — project skeleton, domain model, API stubs, executable acceptance tests. Write access is scoped to its own service directory under modernized/.
business-rules-extractor
Mines domain logic, calculations, validations, and policies from legacy code into testable Given/When/Then specifications. Use when you need to separate "what the business requires" from "how the old code happened to implement it.".
test-engineer
Writes characterization, contract, and equivalence tests that pin down legacy behavior so transformation can be proven correct. Use before any rewrite.