Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to joanmarcriera/Home-office-automations. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/joanmarcriera/Home-office-automations/main/.claude/agents/playbook-reviewer.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/joanmarcriera/Home-office-automationsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/joanmarcriera/home-office-automations/playbook-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/joanmarcriera/home-office-automations/playbook-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/joanmarcriera/home-office-automations/playbook-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/joanmarcriera/home-office-automations/playbook-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/joanmarcriera/home-office-automations/playbook-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00050 | $0.00669 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00025 | $0.00334 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00134 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00067 |
Grade A, and why
playbook-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 74 lines · 50 tokens per session scan A 0a475ea84a17
playbook-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository joanmarcriera/Home-office-automations (5 stars, last pushed today), with no licence file. It adds 50 tokens to every session and 669 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
check
Code quality auditor for the Trellis channel runtime. Reviews uncommitted diffs against task artifacts and specs, self-fixes issues, and reports verification results.
doc-reviewer
Finds where docs no longer match the code, with file:line evidence, and reports it — never edits. Use before a release or after a refactor to catch doc drift.
code-reviewer
Reviews code for bugs, logic errors, security vulnerabilities, code quality issues, and adherence to project conventions, using confidence-based filtering to report only high-priority issues.
code-simplifier
Simplifies and refines code for clarity, consistency, and maintainability while preserving all functionality. Focuses on recently modified code unless instructed otherwise.
integration-reviewer
Read-only for repo state (no commits, no source edits that survive) fresh-context reviewer for the merged integration diff across all tasks in an orchestration run — running checks may temporarily mutate the working tree, always restored exactly. Invoked at Phase 5 so the coordinator's own degraded peak context never…
test-quality-auditor
Read-only for repo state (no commits, no source edits that survive) verifier that audits one task's diff and tests for quality — running the tests (step 4) DOES temporarily mutate the working tree, always restored exactly. Invoked between self-review and done so the session that wrote the code does not grade its own…