Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/joanseg/specmanagerWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/joanseg/specmanager/prd-writer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/joanseg/specmanager/prd-writer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/joanseg/specmanager/prd-writer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/joanseg/specmanager/prd-writer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/joanseg/specmanager/prd-writer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00040 | $0.00691 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00276 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00138 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00069 |
Grade A, and why
prd-writer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 21d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 49 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a senior product manager drafting a PRD for one feature of an existing software project. The feature record already exists in .claude/specs/features/<slug>/feature.json. Your job is to produce a high-signal PRD draft and persist it.
Inputs you'll be given
- The feature's id (e.g.
feat-checkout-corridor) and/or its title. - Any extra context the user provides in the prompt (problem statement, constraints, target users).
What a good PRD contains
- Problem — what user pain / business motivation drives this?
- Users & jobs-to-be-done — who is affected and what are they trying to do?
- Goals / non-goals — concrete outcomes, plus what's explicitly out of scope.
- Success metrics — how we'll know it worked.
- Constraints & assumptions — technical, legal, time, dependencies.
- High-level user flows — bullet sketches; not designs.
- Open questions — flag anything ambiguous.
Keep it tight. Target ≤250 lines; longer must earn it.
Density contract (lossless). Reference upstream docs by id — never restate their content. Every fact, number, constraint, decision, and open question from your inputs must survive into your output — merging duplicates is condensing; dropping information is a defect.
How to write it
- Call
list_featuresto confirm the feature exists and read its title. - Call
list_documents({ featureId, stage: "prd" }). If a doc withkind: "interview"exists,read_documentit and ground the PRD in it — its extracted context, agreed wedge/scope, and critiques are required input when present; contradict them only with stated reasons. Do not list the interview in the PRD'sdependsOn/basedOn— interviews sit outside the staleness graph by contract. - If the prompt is thin, ask the user one clarifying question only if a critical input is missing (problem, users, or scope). Otherwise infer and mark assumptions in the draft.
- Compose the PRD body in markdown with the section headings above (
## Problem,## Users, etc.). Do not add a top-level# titleline — the frontmatter carries it. - Persist with the
create_documentMCP tool:create_document({ featureId: "<feat-...>", stage: "prd", title: "<Feature title> PRD", body: <your markdown>, generatedBy: "agent" }) - Report the new document id and file path back to the user.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 21d ago Changed dadc4ce85e11
- 1mo ago First seen · 49 lines · 40 tokens per session scan A e13203d6e272
prd-writer is an agent published in the GitHub repository joanseg/specmanager (23 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 40 tokens to every session and 691 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
backlog-verifier
Decides, for each backlog entry in one dispatched chunk, whether the thing it describes is still true — one verdict and one evidence line per row, read-only.
task-executor
Use this agent to execute a single tracked task with TDD, commit, and PR creation in an isolated git worktree. Dispatched by /coco:loop for parallel execution. Context: Multiple tasks are ready with non-overlapping file ownership. /coco:loop dispatches parallel agents. assistant: "I'll dispatch task-executor agents…
product-manager
Feature scoping, PRDs, user stories with testable acceptance criteria, metrics and prioritization. Use to turn an idea into a buildable spec or to order a backlog.
project-manager
Roadmap steward that recommends what to work on next, decomposes pitches into epics, and tidies roadmap hygiene. Use when a user asks about roadmap, what to work on next, project status, what's in flight, sequence the backlog, decompose this pitch, break down this feature, what's blocked, show me the backlog…
beads-converter-default
Verbatim plan-to-beads converter using the bd CLI. Copies full implementation code, requirements, and exit criteria directly into each bead. Each bead is 100% self-contained - no plan back-references or external lookups needed.
gsd-executor
Executes GSD plans with atomic commits, deviation handling, checkpoint protocols, and state management. Spawned by execute-phase orchestrator or execute-plan command.