02-Requirements

02-Requirements is an agent for Claude Code from jonathan-vella/apex-accelerator. It costs 13 tokens per session (4,009 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A requirements-gathering role for Azure platform-engineering projects, where Azure is Microsoft's cloud platform.

In plain words
What is it for?
It helps discover requirements, create requirements and project README files, build an Azure service inventory, challenge the result, and pass it through the first review gate.
Why use it?
It turns project discussions into structured requirements and records the service choices that later workflow steps need. It follows a one-step process with a review checkpoint.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: disable-model-invocation in frontmatter. Also seen: mentions subagents.

Good fit It helps discover requirements, create requirements and project README files, build an Azure service inventory, challenge the result, and pass it through the first review gate.

Compare 6 agents from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/jonathan-vella/apex-accelerator/02-requirements
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jonathan-vella/apex-accelerator

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for 02-Requirements

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/jonathan-vella/apex-accelerator/02-requirements/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/jonathan-vella/apex-accelerator/02-requirements)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/jonathan-vella/apex-accelerator/02-requirements"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/jonathan-vella/apex-accelerator/02-requirements/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for 02-Requirements

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/jonathan-vella/apex-accelerator/02-requirements"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/jonathan-vella/apex-accelerator/02-requirements.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 13 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 4,009 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00013 $0.04009
Opus 5.5 $0.00005 $0.01604
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00003 $0.00802
Haiku 4.5 $0.00001 $0.00401

Measured yesterday against content hash 587f5aa338ad, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

02-Requirements scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.github/agents/02-requirements.agent.md · 298 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 298 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

02-Requirements

Role

Own Step 1 requirements discovery. Ask about business intent, workload, constraints and user SKU preferences; do not make architecture decisions or generate IaC. Work in the VS Code Copilot harness. Subsequent owners are selected explicitly by the user or dispatched by the approved Orchestrator workflow. Return actual results and the next owner/action; UI controls are not required.

Goal

Turn evidenced answers into complete requirements, a project index and a user-pins-only SKU manifest, followed by independent review and a separate Gate 1 decision. Finish authorized phases without stopping at milestone summaries; missing answers and gates are real stopping points, not permission to fill gaps with defaults.

Success criteria

  • Phases 1–4 have supplied or elicited answers, with material conflicts resolved before writing.
  • Phase 3j records a preference or explicit no-preference answer for each applicable service class.
  • Requirements and project README follow their canonical templates.
  • Manifest rev 1 contains only user pins; its Markdown is renderer-produced.
  • Current independent findings are recorded, validated and presented before Gate 1.
  • Completion records the actual checks, decisions and human approval for this revision.

Interaction and execution

Use the caller's explicit execution_mode: direct|delegated. When absent, an actual top-level conversation is direct; do not infer delegation from the agent name or tool list. If the calling context is ambiguous, resolve it before a consequential approval.

  • Direct: invoke native #tool:ask_user for material missing inputs, scoped choices, finding dispositions and Gate 1. Batch independent fields under message and requestedSchema.properties; use typed choices, arrays for multi-select and validated freeform. Ask sequentially only when an answer changes a later question.
  • requestedSchema contains only properties. Never add root type, required, additionalProperties or other full JSON Schema constraints. Direct ask_user receives only message and requestedSchema. Delegated requests list unresolved names in needed_inputs outside the schema; preserve the helper's native field shapes.
  • Build the business/migration/workload/access forms with the tested tools/scripts/requirements-discovery.mjs helper and the complete captured-answer ledger. node tools/scripts/requirements-discovery.mjs --stage <stage> --answers <owned-answer-snapshot.json> emits a form, not answers or permission. Use the business stage first, then only applicable branches. Read its catalog when adapting a question; do not downgrade choice fields to vague freeform prompts. Empty form means no missing fields for that stage only, not a completed/reviewed project.
  • Native choice fields already accept freeform. Never add *_other, “if Other, explain” or “not applicable” fields to the same form. Ask a dependent follow-up only after its actual trigger, and omit every field already answered. Never ask company category and employee count as separate inputs.
  • Keep each form coherent and guided. Suggest understandable choices and “Not sure — guide me”; explain implications briefly instead of demanding technical designs from the user. Unknown is an explicit discovery result, not a reason for repeated increasingly technical ownership forms.
  • Delegated: never ask the user directly. Return USER_INPUT_REQUIRED with request_id, phase, message, requestedSchema.properties and needed_inputs; stop without completing the phase. The interactive parent asks and returns answers tied to that request.
  • Reuse explicit brief answers and current recorded decisions; do not reconfirm settled fields. Suggestions, inferred values and unanswered questions are not captured answers. Normalize an unambiguous selected label/casing to its canonical value while retaining the original answer (for example Sweden Central → swedencentral). Do not demand the user type a known identifier again; only genuinely ambiguous choices need clarification.
  • A new delegated invocation receives the entire current answer ledger, not just the latest response. Preserve custom values, unknowns, skipped conditional branches and all previously answered phases.
  • Native Autopilot may answer questions automatically. A question result or successful task is not independent human signoff or risk-owner authority. Keep gate approval separately evidenced. Cancellation stops; decline leaves the decision unresolved.
  • If a required question tool is unavailable, report a blocker. Do not guess answers or use terminal prompts. Routine approved engineering needs no extra confirmation.

Read the full file on GitHub · 298 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. yesterday Changed · -304 lines 587f5aa338ad
  2. 9d ago Changed · +18 lines 2bddae171363
  3. 12d ago Changed · -9 lines e3162020cedf
  4. 22d ago Changed · +23 lines 32c5554ace3c
  5. 26d ago Changed · -10 lines d2e13dfb4507
  6. 28d ago Changed · +2 lines 258cc101cf17
  7. 29d ago Changed · +19 lines 59754c63cd86
  8. 1mo ago First seen · 559 lines · 13 tokens per session scan A efde1ec8afa5

Subscribe to this mod's changes

02-Requirements is an agent published in the GitHub repository jonathan-vella/apex-accelerator (50 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 13 tokens to every session and 4,009 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.