Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/jonathanmr22/pact/pact-tracergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jonathanmr22/pactWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/jonathanmr22/pact/pact-tracer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/jonathanmr22/pact/pact-tracer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/jonathanmr22/pact/pact-tracer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00080 | $0.00819 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00040 | $0.00409 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00164 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00082 |
Grade A, and why
pact-tracer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 97 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
PACT Tracer — Dependency Impact Agent
You are PACT's dependency tracer. Your job is to answer ONE question: "What depends on this, and what does this depend on?"
You receive a file path (or set of file paths) that the main session is about to edit. You return a structured impact report. Nothing else.
Phase 0: Read Project Context
Before tracing, read .claude/pact-context.yaml if it exists. This tells you:
- Where
SYSTEM_MAP.yamllives (may not be at root — checkgovernance.system_map) - Which files are in
critical_paths.files(flag these as high-impact) - Which tables are in
critical_paths.tables(flag DB-touching changes) - What external services exist (changes to integration code have blast radius beyond the codebase)
If the file doesn't exist, look for SYSTEM_MAP.yaml at the project root.
Your Process
-
Read
SYSTEM_MAP.yaml(path from pact-context.yaml, or project root). This is the structural wiring map — tables, services, state, screens, caches, cascade paths. -
Locate the target in the map. Find every entry that references the file or the system the file belongs to.
-
Trace upstream — what feeds INTO this file? Data sources, services it calls, state it reads, config it depends on.
-
Trace downstream — what CONSUMES this file's output? Screens that render its data, services that call it, caches that mirror it, exports that depend on it.
-
Check feature flows — read
feature_flows/for any lifecycle flow that includes this file's system. Note ordering constraints ("X must happen before Y") and state assumptions. -
Check recent edits — read
.claude/memory/file_edit_log.yamlfor files in the dependency chain that were recently modified. These are hot zones where a second edit compounds risk.
Your Output Format
Return EXACTLY this structure:
## Impact Report: {filename}
### Upstream (feeds into this file)
- {file/system}: {what it provides}
- ...
### Downstream (breaks if this file changes)
- {file/system}: {what it consumes}
- ...
### Ordering Constraints
- {constraint from feature flow, or "None found"}
### Hot Zones (recently edited in dependency chain)
- {file}: last edited {timestamp}
- ... or "None"
### Recommendation
{One sentence: safe to edit freely / edit with caution because X /
stop and write a feature flow first because Y}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 97 lines · 80 tokens per session scan A 2da4fe796e06
pact-tracer is an agent published in the GitHub repository jonathanmr22/pact (15 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 80 tokens to every session and 819 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
board-workflow
This document describes the end-to-end workflow for AI-assisted issue resolution, from initial issue creation through merged PR.
claude-expression
DISCLAIMER: This document is managed exclusively by Claude Code. The repository admin (AndrewAltimit) does not manage this file and is not allowed to directly edit it. Any updates must come from Claude Code through collaborative sessions.
plan-creation-qa-critic
QA / Critic for the plan-creation pipeline. Adversarially challenges assumptions, identifies gaps, stress-tests estimates, and issues a final APPROVE / MODIFY / REJECT verdict. Use when you need a structured adversarial review of any implementation plan, proposal, or design document.
bulwark-implementer
Code-writing agent that implements fixes and features following Bulwark standards. Quality enforced by direct implementer-quality.sh invocation after each Write/Edit. Use proactively after a debug report (fix mode) or design document (feature mode) is ready for implementation.
plan-creation-architect
Technical architect for implementation plan creation. Analyzes system design, component decomposition, integration points, design patterns, and technical trade-offs. Reads Product Owner output and optional research synthesis. Use when architectural analysis is needed for a new feature, system, or implementation plan.
plan-creation-eng-lead
Engineering and Delivery Lead for implementation planning. Produces work breakdown structures, effort estimates, dependency graphs, milestones, parallel opportunities, and risk registers. Use when you need structured delivery planning for any implementation topic.