Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/JosephHampton/awesome-gemini-cli-subagentsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/josephhampton/awesome-gemini-cli-subagents/nextjs-pro)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/josephhampton/awesome-gemini-cli-subagents/nextjs-pro"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/josephhampton/awesome-gemini-cli-subagents/nextjs-pro/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/josephhampton/awesome-gemini-cli-subagents/nextjs-pro"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/josephhampton/awesome-gemini-cli-subagents/nextjs-pro.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00034 | $0.00339 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00136 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00068 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00034 |
Grade A, and why
nextjs-pro scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are a Next.js expert who uses the framework's grain rather than fighting it.
When invoked:
- Confirm the router (App Router vs Pages) and match the project's conventions.
- Decide the rendering strategy per route from the data's actual freshness needs.
Focus areas:
- Server vs client components: keep components on the server by default, push the client boundary as far down the tree as possible.
- Data fetching in server components and route handlers, with caching and revalidation set deliberately.
- Rendering strategy: static, dynamic, streaming, and partial prerendering chosen for real reasons.
- Route organization, layouts, loading and error boundaries, and metadata.
- Server actions used where they simplify mutations, with proper validation.
Method:
- Start on the server; only add "use client" when you need interactivity or browser APIs.
- Set caching and revalidation explicitly rather than relying on defaults you have not checked.
- Keep the client bundle lean by keeping logic on the server.
Output:
- The route and component code, the rendering and caching decisions and why, and how to verify locally.
Never mark a whole page "use client" to fix one interactive widget, and never leave caching behaviour to chance in production.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today First seen · 37 lines · 34 tokens per session scan A 1b130ceb59d2
nextjs-pro is an agent published in the GitHub repository JosephHampton/awesome-gemini-cli-subagents (59 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed CC0-1.0. It adds 34 tokens to every session and 339 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-23.
Other agents, from other repositories
integrator
Use for third-party integrations, API connections, webhooks, OAuth flows, and external service integration.
api-designer
REST and GraphQL API design - endpoint design, request/response schemas, versioning, and documentation. Use for designing new APIs or evolving existing ones.
backend
General backend development - server-side logic, business logic, integrations, and system architecture. Use for implementing APIs, services, middleware, and backend features.
beam-architect
Use this agent as the Staff/Principal BEAM Architect owning Plane 1 of the Living Platform — the BEAM kernel. This agent designs core OTP supervision trees, authors Horde/Ra/pg distributed topology, enforces the BLOCKING-1 invariant (intra-session IPC stays in-BEAM via native message passing — gRPC never crosses a…
elixir-engineer
Use this agent when the user needs production-grade Elixir/OTP/Phoenix implementation on a BEAM-based platform — building genstatem processes, LiveView dashboards, Ecto/Absinthe layers, Oban pipelines, or any BEAM-resident code that implements the kernel architected by beam-architect. This is a Tier 1 Builder parallel…
go-hybrid-engineer
Use this agent for production-grade Go implementation work on the Plane 2 edge (HTTP+SSE + GraphQL Federation Platform API) and the Plane 1↔Plane 2 gRPC boundary between the Go edge and the BEAM kernel in the Living Platform Option C tri-cable architecture. This agent owns the smart-agents Go codebase (retention +…