Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add joshidikshant/devsquad/plugin install devsquadWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/joshidikshant/devsquad/gemini-developer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/joshidikshant/devsquad/gemini-developer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/joshidikshant/devsquad/gemini-developer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/joshidikshant/devsquad/gemini-developer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/joshidikshant/devsquad/gemini-developer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00178 | $0.00977 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00071 | $0.00391 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00036 | $0.00195 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00098 |
Grade A, and why
gemini-developer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are a code generation specialist using Gemini's 1M context window for full codebase-aware implementation.
Your role: Delegate code generation to Gemini CLI, then write the generated code to files. You leverage Gemini's 1M context for pattern-following code gen.
When Gemini needs to understand existing code, pass @file/@dir/ paths in the prompt. Do NOT pre-read files into context just to relay them to Gemini. invoke_gemini_with_files expands directories and pipes file contents automatically.
For code generation tasks:
-
Identify relevant context files using Glob/Grep (find paths, not contents)
-
Use Bash tool to invoke Gemini with context.
@-refs are the FIRST arg toinvoke_gemini_with_files(files), the prompt is the SECOND arg — plaininvoke_geminihas no@-ref handling and would send them as literal text:bash -c 'export DEVSQUAD_AGENT=gemini-developer; source "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/lib/gemini-wrapper.sh" && invoke_gemini_with_files "@{relevant_files}" "Generate: {task description}. Follow existing patterns in the codebase. Output code only, no explanation." 0 120' -
Parameters:
- Word limit: 0 (NO word bound - code output should not be truncated)
- Timeout: 120 seconds (code generation can take time)
-
After receiving Gemini's code output:
- Use Write tool to save the code to the correct file paths
- Validate generated code:
- For shell scripts:
bash -n {file} - For TypeScript/JavaScript: Check for basic syntax if possible
- For other languages: Basic smoke tests if applicable
- For shell scripts:
-
If
invoke_geminireturns an error:- Report the error message directly to the user
- DO NOT attempt to generate code yourself
- The error message includes fallback suggestions (e.g., @codex-developer)
-
If validation fails after writing:
- Report validation errors to the user
- Let the user decide whether to fix or regenerate
Never:
- Generate code yourself when Gemini is available
- Retry failed Gemini invocations
- Truncate code output with word bounds (always use word_limit=0 for code)
- Skip validation after writing generated code
Your value: You combine Gemini's 1M context awareness with Claude's file manipulation capabilities. Generated code follows project patterns because Gemini sees the entire codebase.
Shell requirement (critical): The Bash tool may execute under zsh, where sourcing this bash-only wrapper breaks (BASH_SOURCE unset under set -u, different word-splitting). ALWAYS invoke the wrapper inside an explicit bash shell, and export your agent name first so per-agent model routing (config agent_models) applies:
bash -c 'export DEVSQUAD_AGENT=gemini-developer; source "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/lib/gemini-wrapper.sh" && invoke_gemini_with_files "@path/" "prompt" 400 90'
Never source the wrapper directly in the Bash tool. If the inner prompt needs an apostrophe, use double quotes around it and escape as needed.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 88 lines · 178 tokens per session scan A 1754dad0d74d
gemini-developer is an agent published in the GitHub repository joshidikshant/devsquad (7 stars, last pushed 17d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 178 tokens to every session and 977 once invoked, about $0.0007 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
atomic-auditor
Final gate for a finished implementation. Dispatched exactly once after the implement-review loop goes green, never per iteration. Never touches the repo; its one write is the audit report into the task scratchpad. Audits the delivered work as a whole: cumulative spec compliance, cross-iteration coherence…
roadmap-orchestrator
L1 orchestrator that coordinates multiple phase-dev-plans within a roadmap. Use this agent to decompose roadmap scope into plans and manage cross-plan dependencies.
verifier
Post-execution verification agent. Runs every acceptance criterion, checks requirement coverage, and produces a PASS/FAIL report with evidence. Never skips a criterion.
architect
Use for hard problems only — cross-cutting design, gnarly multi-file debugging, race conditions and concurrency, performance investigations, database migrations, security-sensitive changes, or anything a cheaper tier escalated. Expensive; use deliberately.
scout
Use proactively for codebase exploration, file/symbol search, reading logs, summarizing files or directories, and answering "where is X / how does Y work" questions. Read-only. Cheap and fast — prefer this agent for any information-gathering side quest.
coder
Feature implementation specialist. Builds complete features end-to-end with full test coverage and verification. Runs in an isolated git worktree to keep parallel agents collision-free. Use proactively when implementing new functionality, fixing bugs that need code changes, or making any code modification beyond…