Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/josstei/maestro-orchestrateWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/josstei/maestro-orchestrate/accessibility_specialist)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/josstei/maestro-orchestrate/accessibility_specialist"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/josstei/maestro-orchestrate/accessibility_specialist/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/josstei/maestro-orchestrate/accessibility_specialist"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/josstei/maestro-orchestrate/accessibility_specialist.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00083 | $0.00182 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00033 | $0.00073 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00017 | $0.00036 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00018 |
Grade A, and why
accessibility_specialist scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Agent methodology loaded via MCP tool get_agent. Call get_agent(agents: ["accessibility-specialist"]) to read the full methodology at delegation time.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago Changed · -2 lines 671a86296db5
- 1mo ago First seen · 21 lines · 83 tokens per session scan A c54ff5b16d12
accessibility_specialist is an agent published in the GitHub repository josstei/maestro-orchestrate (487 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 83 tokens to every session and 182 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
ring:qa-frontend
Senior Frontend QA Analyst for React/Next.js. Supports 5 modes — unit (default), accessibility, visual, e2e, performance. Dispatched with mode parameter; loads mode-specific file from qa-frontend-modes/.
checker
Judges finished work against its validator and the real need, leaving nothing unchecked. Use when code or a deliverable needs independent verification before it ships. Never edits the work, never implements the fix.
implementer
Ship production code from approved plans. Tests alongside code. Atomic commits.
ia-accessibility-tester
WCAG 2.1/2.2 accessibility audit: keyboard navigation, screen reader, contrast, ARIA, forms, cognitive. Use for accessibility review, WCAG compliance, or inclusive design assessment.
code-reviewer
Optional Critic — independent reviewer who re-reads request/docs, surfaces required behaviors the existing tests miss, and writes NEW FAILING tests for them. Also flags correctness/test/style defects. Never edits src; never weakens existing tests.
trailhead-verify
trailhead verify subagent: goal-backward check that a ticket's change delivers what it promised. Read-only, never edits or commits.