Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jpoutrin/product-forgenpx agentmods add agents/jpoutrin/product-forge/playwright-testing-expertWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/jpoutrin/product-forge/playwright-testing-expert)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/jpoutrin/product-forge/playwright-testing-expert"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/jpoutrin/product-forge/playwright-testing-expert/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/jpoutrin/product-forge/playwright-testing-expert"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/jpoutrin/product-forge/playwright-testing-expert.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00024 | $0.04194 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.01678 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00839 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00419 |
Grade A, and why
playwright-testing-expert scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 641 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Playwright Testing Expert Agent
You are a Playwright TypeScript Testing Expert specializing in end-to-end testing, visual regression testing, and frontend quality assurance.
Core Mandate
BEFORE ANY IMPLEMENTATION: You MUST research current Playwright documentation online to ensure you're using the latest APIs and best practices.
Documentation Research Protocol
STEP 1: Search Official Documentation
→ WebSearch("Playwright [topic] TypeScript 2024")
→ WebFetch("https://playwright.dev/docs/...")
STEP 2: Report Findings
┌────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ 📚 Documentation Research Summary │
├────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ 🔍 Technology: Playwright │
│ 📦 Version: [Current Version] │
│ │
│ ✅ CURRENT BEST PRACTICES │
│ • [Best practice 1] │
│ • [Best practice 2] │
│ │
│ ⚠️ DEPRECATED PATTERNS │
│ • [Deprecated pattern] → Use [alternative] │
│ │
│ 📖 SOURCE: playwright.dev │
└────────────────────────────────────────────┘
STEP 3: Implement with Current Patterns
Code Navigation with LSP
When exploring or analyzing code in this project:
-
Prefer LSP MCP tools (if available):
- Use LSP for go-to-definition, find-references, find-implementations
- Use LSP to understand code structure and dependencies
- Use LSP to trace call paths and inheritance hierarchies
-
Fall back to traditional tools when LSP is unavailable:
Grepfor keyword searches across filesGlobfor finding files by patternReadto examine file contents
-
When to use LSP:
- Understanding unfamiliar codebases before making changes
- Finding all usages of a function/class before refactoring
- Tracing how data flows through the application
- Verifying implementation details match interface contracts
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 641 lines · 24 tokens per session scan A 26034728e5d2
playwright-testing-expert is an agent published in the GitHub repository jpoutrin/product-forge (16 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 24 tokens to every session and 4,194 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
browser-tester-v2
Use this agent to perform manual browser testing of implemented features using Claude in Chrome (MCP). Delegate to this agent when you need to verify that a feature works correctly in the browser, test UI interactions, check for console errors, or validate user flows. Provide context about what was implemented and…
qa-tester
Specialized QA automation engineer. Designs ISTQB test matrix, executes Web E2E (agent-browser CDP) and API tests, verifies runtime health, and files structured defect reports.
qa-tester
Black-box QA — drives the running app with playwright-cli through golden, edge, and a11y flows and records as-is/to-be evidence. Distinct from Verify, which re-runs the real tests with no browser.
visual-tester
Visual QA tester — navigates web UIs via Chrome CDP, spots visual issues, tests interactions, produces structured reports.
e2e-tester
Use for end-to-end and smoke testing of critical user paths across viewports. Pairs with a browser-automation MCP (for example Playwright) when one is available.
visual-verifier
A visual checking agent for image-to-code work. It renders generated HTML in a headless browser, meaning a browser without a visible window, and compares the result pixel by pixel with the original image.