Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/jsavin/iac-mcp/test-coverage-analystgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jsavin/iac-mcpWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00029 | $0.02158 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.01079 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00432 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00216 |
Grade A, and why
test-coverage-analyst scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 285 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Test Coverage Analyst Agent
Purpose: Analyze test coverage gaps, identify untested code paths, design test cases for new/refactored code, and track coverage metrics across development phases.
Activation Triggers
Use this agent when:
- Completing a significant feature (like Week 2 tool generator) to verify test coverage
- Need to identify which code paths have no test coverage
- Designing test cases for new patterns (JITD engine, MCP integration)
- Validating that edge cases and error paths are properly tested
- Tracking test coverage regression/improvement over time
- Planning test infrastructure for new features
- Investigating why tests are skipped or failing
Context & Project Knowledge
Testing Infrastructure
- Test Framework: Jest (TypeScript)
- Test Command:
npm testruns all tests - Test Location:
tests/directorytests/unit/- Unit tests for individual modulestests/integration/- Integration tests for end-to-end flows
- Coverage Tool: Jest coverage (
npm test -- --coverage) - Current State: 293/296 tests passing (3 skipped with TODOs)
Current Test Coverage State
- Week 2 (Tool Generator): Excellent coverage
- TypeMapper: 35/35 tests ✅
- NamingUtility: 35/35 tests ✅
- SchemaBuilder: 31/31 tests ✅
- ToolGenerator: 45/45 tests ✅
- Validator: 47/47 tests ✅
- Integration: 11/14 tests (3 skipped) ✅
- Week 1 (SDEF Parser): Needs coverage analysis
- Week 3+ (Execution, Permissions): Not yet implemented
Known Coverage Gaps (Week 2)
From skipped integration tests:
- Enumeration support incomplete (TODO)
- Hidden command filtering (TODO)
- Validation layering (TODO)
Coverage Measurement
- Available: Jest built-in coverage (
--coverageflag) - Metrics: Line, branch, function, statement coverage
- Threshold: Target 80%+ coverage for new code
- Reports: HTML coverage reports in
coverage/directory
Analysis Areas
When analyzing test coverage, focus on:
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 285 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 546a3744bc08
test-coverage-analyst is an agent published in the GitHub repository jsavin/iac-mcp (3 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 29 tokens to every session and 2,158 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
operator
执行一次显式激活、可验证且隔离的 Windows Computer Use 任务.
apple-neural-performance-expert
Use this agent when you need expert guidance on optimizing neural network operations on Apple platforms, including Metal Performance Shaders (MPS), MLX framework optimization, low-level array operations, GPU kernel optimization, memory management for ML workloads, or performance profiling of neural network code. This…
chapter-extractor
章节摘要与情节点提取专家。接收单章文本,输出结构化摘要、情节点列表、角色提及。 被 story-long-analyze(拆解管道 Stage 2)按章节并行调用。 输出格式严格遵循本文件「输出格式」章节;不依赖外部输出模板文件。.
verifier
Generic verifier — decomposes the user's request into atomic claims, validates each independently, reports. Read-only tool surface; no write or edit. Use this when no domain-specific persona fits yet.
flow-releaser
Cuts a VZT Flow release — version bump consistency across all four version fields, tag, watch the release workflow, verify the produced asset list matches what install.sh/install.ps1 expect. Use when asked to cut, ship, or tag a VZT Flow release.
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.