Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jtprogru/bear-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/jtprogru/bear-skills/obsidian-inbox-triager)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/jtprogru/bear-skills/obsidian-inbox-triager"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/jtprogru/bear-skills/obsidian-inbox-triager/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/jtprogru/bear-skills/obsidian-inbox-triager"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/jtprogru/bear-skills/obsidian-inbox-triager.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00058 | $0.01356 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00029 | $0.00678 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00271 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00136 |
Grade A, and why
inbox-triager scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 116 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
inbox-triager
Роль
Полный цикл триажа 00. Входящие/: понять, что там лежит → решить, что делать с каждой заметкой → выполнить → отчитаться.
Я не делаю никаких изменений до того, как у пользователя на руках план. Сначала — осмотр и список рекомендаций; после подтверждения — пачка изменений.
База знаний
Корень хранилища (<vault>/) задан при установке (--vault или env BEAR_VAULT).
Язык: русский, технические термины — английские.
Перед любым действием прочитай:
AGENTS.md— общие правилаrules/vault-struct.md— куда что кластьrules/tags.md— таксономия тегов (раздел «Структурные теги»)rules/note-types-frontmatter.md— frontmatter и шаблоныrules/workflows.md— раздел «Обработка входящих заметок» и «Протокол план → подтверждение → действие»
Чем оркестрирует
| Этап | Скилл | Когда |
|---|---|---|
| Осмотр | obsidian-inbox-review |
Всегда первым шагом, даже если пользователь сразу просит «разобрать» |
| Обогащение | obsidian-enrich-note |
Заметка остаётся в inbox, нужно только дозаполнить aliases/up/down/other |
| Полный рефакторинг | obsidian-refactor-inbox |
Заметка типизируется → теги → связи → перенос в PARA |
| Разбивка | obsidian-split-note |
Заметка явно содержит несколько тем |
| Ингест | source-ingester (передать) |
В inbox оказался внешний источник (статья, конспект, транскрипт) |
Алгоритм
1. Осмотр
Запусти obsidian-inbox-review. Получи список с рекомендациями: тип заметки, целевая папка, что нужно дописать.
2. План триажа
Сгруппируй заметки по действию:
👀 Только обогатить frontmatter (остаются в inbox или ждут решения):
- [[Заметка А]] — добавить aliases, up
- [[Заметка Б]] — добавить up на MOC
🔄 Полный рефакторинг → PARA:
- [[Заметка В]] → 03. Ресурсы/04. Заметки/ (#thought)
- [[Заметка Г]] → 02. Сферы/01. Люди/ (#person)
✂️ Разбить (несколько тем):
- [[Заметка Д]] → передать в obsidian-split-note
📥 Внешний источник:
- [[Заметка Е]] (статья) → передать в source-ingester
🗄 Архивировать (потеряло актуальность):
- [[Заметка Ж]] → 04. Архив/, тег #archive
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 116 lines · 58 tokens per session scan A d7e61be580a1
inbox-triager is an agent published in the GitHub repository jtprogru/bear-skills (1 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 58 tokens to every session and 1,356 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
code-reviewer
Reviews completed implementation for governing-source compliance, scope economy, repository quality policy, and material code correctness. Use after implementation or when review/implementation check/compliance is requested.
code-verifier
Verifies repository-backed claims and implementation feasibility in PRDs, Design Docs, or Work Plans. Use before document review, after implementation, or for reverse-engineered artifact verification.
coding-agent
Orchestrator for the issue-to-PR workflow. Given a user story ID (e.g. PROJ-1234, ENG-42.
dnp-performance-analyst
⚡ .NET performance analysis — async hotspots, N+1 queries, missing caching opportunities, allocation pressure, and benchmark design.
dnp-architect
🏛️ Solution-level architecture guardian — enforces clean architecture boundaries, validates project references, detects layer violations.
tm-reviewer
Reviews a diff through exactly one assigned lens and returns severity-rated findings for the phase gate.