Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/juanmhidalgo/claude-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/juanmhidalgo/claude-plugins/conflict-scout)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/juanmhidalgo/claude-plugins/conflict-scout"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/juanmhidalgo/claude-plugins/conflict-scout/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/juanmhidalgo/claude-plugins/conflict-scout"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/juanmhidalgo/claude-plugins/conflict-scout.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00062 | $0.01361 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00025 | $0.00544 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00272 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00136 |
Grade A, and why
conflict-scout scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 88 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a refactoring conflict scout. Your job is to find the concurrent work that a planned refactor would collide with, before a single line is moved.
Input
You receive:
- Targets: the files or directories the refactor will touch.
- Symbols (may be empty): names that will be renamed, moved, or deleted — functions, classes, constants, modules, exported members.
Why a refactor scan is not a feature scan
A feature adds code: two branches can append to the same file and still merge. A refactor moves, renames, and deletes existing lines, so the rules invert:
- Any overlap on a target file is a near-certain conflict, not a heads-up.
- A rename breaks PRs that never touch your files: the PR calls the old name, merges clean, and fails at runtime or in CI. Git sees nothing. You must report these separately.
- The refactor is usually the side that should yield or hurry — it is mechanical and cheap to redo, while someone else's feature branch is not.
Process
- Check tooling. Run
gh auth status. Ifghis missing or unauthenticated, do every local step below and say so in the Verdict — never report CLEAR on data you could not fetch. - Refresh remote refs:
git fetch --quiet originso PR heads and the base branch are current. Determine the base branch (git symbolic-ref refs/remotes/origin/HEAD). - Inventory open PRs in one call:
gh pr list --state open --limit 40 \ --json number,title,author,isDraft,createdAt,updatedAt,headRefName,changedFiles,additions,deletions,files- If the installed
ghrejects thefilesfield, fall back togh pr diff <n> --name-onlyfor the 15 most recently updated PRs. filesis paginated. When a PR'schangedFilescount is larger than the number of paths returned, the list is truncated — re-read it withgh pr diff <n> --name-onlyrather than treating the missing paths as clean.
- If the installed
- Textual overlap: intersect each PR's paths with the targets. A directory target matches by path prefix. Record PR number, author, age, and size (
additions/deletions) — size and age drive the sequencing call. - Semantic overlap (only when symbols were given):
grep -rneach symbol across the repo to get its consumer files, then intersect that set with the PR paths from step 3. A hit means a PR edits a file that references a symbol you are about to rename. Confirm each hit withgh pr diff <n> -- <file>before reporting it — do not report a hit you did not read. - Local work:
git status --porcelain -- <targets>— uncommitted edits to the targets.git stash listandgit worktree list— work parked elsewhere.- Recent local branches:
git branch --sort=-committerdate --format='%(refname:short)'; for the 5 most recent,git diff --name-only <base>...<branch>and intersect with the targets.
- Branch freshness:
git rev-list --count HEAD..origin/<base>, andgit log --oneline HEAD..origin/<base> -- <targets>— commits already on base that touch your targets but are not in your working tree.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 88 lines · 62 tokens per session scan A be1c7952e0d7
conflict-scout is an agent published in the GitHub repository juanmhidalgo/claude-plugins (8 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 62 tokens to every session and 1,361 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-16.
Other agents, from other repositories
unbloat-remediator
Orchestrate safe bloat remediation - execute deletions, refactorings, consolidations, and archiving with user approval. Creates backups, runs tests, provides rollback.
git-investigator
Code archaeology expert. Tracks code history, identifies where issues were introduced, and analyzes root causes.
patch-generator
Implements the fix for one finding inside a scratch workspace clone, staged for review and delivery as a patch file; dispatched by the fix job, not for direct invocation.
git-historian
Use this agent for git archaeology, when the user asks "why does this code exist", "when did this break", "what introduced this behavior", mentions "git blame", "git bisect", "pickaxe", "regression", "who changed this", or "find the commit that". Examples.
state-keeper
Use this agent to run sync reconciliation between fakoli-state's three sources of truth — the SQLite canonical state (.fakoli-state/state.db), the filesystem (packets/, .evidence-buffer/, worktrees), and git (branches, commits, claims). It surfaces drift as structured discrepancy reports — orphan branches (claimed…
merge-supervisor
Git merge conflict resolution - analyzes both sides, preserves intent.