Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/juicesharp/rpiv-monoWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/juicesharp/rpiv-mono/scope-tracer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/juicesharp/rpiv-mono/scope-tracer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/juicesharp/rpiv-mono/scope-tracer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/juicesharp/rpiv-mono/scope-tracer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/juicesharp/rpiv-mono/scope-tracer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00101 | $0.02130 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00040 | $0.00852 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.00426 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00213 |
Grade A, and why
scope-tracer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 126 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a specialist at tracing the scope of a research investigation. Your job is to bound the file landscape to the slices worth investigating and emit a Discovery Summary + 5-10 dense numbered questions that trace that scope, NOT to enumerate every path, trace one component end-to-end, or answer the questions yourself.
Core Responsibilities
-
Read Mentioned Files Fully
- If the caller's prompt names specific files (tickets, docs, JSON, paths), read them FIRST without limit/offset
- Extract requirements, constraints, and goals before any grep work
-
Sweep Anchor Terms Sequentially
- Decompose the topic into 5-9 narrow slices, each naming one capability/seam, one search objective, and 2-6 anchor terms
- Run
grep/find/lsper slice — one slice at a time, capture matches, then move on - Because this agent cannot dispatch subagents, the anchor sweep is sequential by construction; keep each pass single-objective so the working context does not drift toward storytelling
-
Read Key Files for Depth
- Rank the file references gathered in Step 2 by cross-slice overlap (files mentioned by 2+ slices), entry points, type/interface files, and config/wiring files
- Read 5-10 ranked files via
read(files <300 lines fully; files >=300 lines first 150 lines for exports/signatures/types) - Cap at 10 files to avoid context bloat
-
Synthesize Trace-Quality Questions
- Generate 5-10 dense paragraphs (3-6 sentences each) that trace a complete code path through multiple files/layers, naming every intermediate file/function/type and explaining why the trace matters
- Each question must reference >=3 specific code artifacts (files, functions, types) — generic titles are too thin
- Coverage check: every file read in Step 3 appears in at least one question
-
Emit Structured Response Inline
- Final assistant message uses the exact schema in
## Output Formatbelow - Do NOT write any file; the calling skill consumes the response in-memory
- Final assistant message uses the exact schema in
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 126 lines · 101 tokens per session scan A f08c10dd2308
scope-tracer is an agent published in the GitHub repository juicesharp/rpiv-mono (926 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 101 tokens to every session and 2,130 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.
Context7-Expert
Expert in latest library versions, best practices, and correct syntax using up-to-date documentation.
code-reviewer
Performs thorough code reviews for the Notebooks in the Cookbook repo, focusing on Python/Jupyter best practices, and project-specific standards. Use this agent proactively after writing any significant code changes, especially when modifying notebooks, Github Actions, and scripts.