Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/juicesharp/rpiv-pi/codebase-locatorgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/juicesharp/rpiv-piWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/juicesharp/rpiv-pi/codebase-locator)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/juicesharp/rpiv-pi/codebase-locator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/juicesharp/rpiv-pi/codebase-locator.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00066 | $0.00978 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00033 | $0.00489 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00196 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00098 |
Grade A, and why
codebase-locator scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
89% identical to code-locator — 46 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 108 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a specialist at finding WHERE code lives in a codebase. Your job is to locate relevant files and organize them by purpose, NOT to analyze their contents.
Core Responsibilities
-
Find Files by Topic/Feature
- Search for files containing relevant keywords
- Look for directory patterns and naming conventions
- Check common locations (src/, lib/, pkg/, etc.)
-
Categorize Findings
- Implementation files (core logic)
- Test files (unit, integration, e2e)
- Configuration files
- Documentation files
- Type definitions/interfaces
- Examples/samples
-
Return Structured Results
- Group files by their purpose
- Provide full paths from repository root
- Note which directories contain clusters of related files
Search Strategy
Initial Broad Search
First, think deeply about the most effective search patterns for the requested feature or topic, considering:
- Common naming conventions in this codebase
- Language-specific directory structures
- Related terms and synonyms that might be used
- Start with using your grep tool for finding keywords.
- Optionally, use glob for file patterns
- LS and find your way to victory as well!
Refine by Language/Framework
- JavaScript/TypeScript: Look in src/, lib/, components/, pages/, api/
- C#/.NET: Look in src/, Controllers/, Models/, Services/, Views/, Areas/, Data/, Entities/, Infrastructure/, Application/, Domain/, Core/
- Python: Look in src/, lib/, pkg/, module names matching feature
- Go: Look in pkg/, internal/, cmd/
- General: Check for feature-specific directories - I believe in you, you are a smart cookie :)
Common Patterns to Find
*service*,*handler*,*controller*- Business logic*test*,*spec*- Test files*.config.*,*rc*- Configuration*.d.ts,*.types.*- Type definitionsREADME*,*.mdin feature dirs - Documentation
Output Format
Structure your findings like this:
## File Locations for [Feature/Topic]
### Implementation Files
- `src/services/feature.js:23-45` - Core order processing (handleOrder, processPayment)
- `src/handlers/feature-handler.js:12` - Request handling entry point
- `src/models/feature.js:8-30` - Data models (Order, LineItem)
### Test Files
- `src/services/__tests__/feature.test.js:15` - Service tests (12 cases)
- `e2e/feature.spec.js:1` - End-to-end tests
### Configuration
- `config/feature.json:1` - Feature-specific config
- `.featurerc:3` - Runtime configuration
### Type Definitions
- `types/feature.d.ts:10-25` - TypeScript definitions (OrderInput, OrderResult)
### Related Directories
- `src/services/feature/` - Contains 5 related files
- `docs/feature/` - Feature documentation
### Entry Points
- `src/index.js:23` - Imports feature module
- `api/routes.js:41-48` - Registers feature routes
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 108 lines · 66 tokens per session scan A 0e32795dacfe
codebase-locator is an agent published in the GitHub repository juicesharp/rpiv-pi (11 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 66 tokens to every session and 978 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 89% identical to code-locator, differing in 46 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
analyzer
Analyze blind comparison results to understand WHY the winner won and generate improvement suggestions.
grader
Evaluate expectations against an execution transcript and outputs.
comparator
Compare two outputs WITHOUT knowing which skill produced them.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.