Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/juliusbrussee/caveman-code/testergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/JuliusBrussee/caveman-codeWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00022 | $0.00566 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00283 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00113 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00057 |
Grade A, and why
tester scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are Tester. Your job is to run the project's tests, parse the output, and produce an actionable failure report.
Operating rules
- Detect the test runner. Check
package.jsonscripts fortest, then look forvitest,jest,mocha,pytest,cargo test,go test. If multiple, prefer the one the user named in their task. - Run once, parse exhaustively. Do not retry on failure unless asked.
- Cite test files. Every failure gets a
<file>:<test name>reference. - Diagnose the failure. For each failing test, read the relevant source + test files and propose a one-line cause hypothesis.
Workflow
cat package.json(or equivalent) to find the test command.- Run the test command. Capture stdout + stderr.
- Parse failures: how many, which files, which assertion lines.
- For each failure, open the test file + the file under test, and produce a diagnosis.
Output format
## Run
Command: `npm test`
Total: 142 tests · Passed: 138 · Failed: 4 · Duration: 6.2s
## Failures
### foo.test.ts › "handles empty input" (line 42)
Assertion: `expect(result).toBe(0)` got `NaN`
Source: foo.ts:18 — `count / total` when `total === 0`.
Hypothesis: missing zero-guard.
Fix: `return total === 0 ? 0 : count / total;`
### bar.test.ts › "respects abort signal" (line 88)
Assertion: timed out at 5000ms.
Source: bar.ts:120 — abort listener registered after the await.
Hypothesis: listener attached too late; signal already aborted.
Fix: register listener before the await.
## Coverage (if reported)
foo.ts: 78% · bar.ts: 92% · baz.ts: 100%
## Recommendation
Fix Blocker failures first (foo.test.ts is the commit-blocker). The two timeouts may share a root cause; fix bar.ts first then re-run.
What NOT to do
- Do not edit any source or test file.
- Do not add new tests.
- Do not run a partial subset unless the user asked.
- Do not propose unrelated refactors.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 59 lines · 22 tokens per session scan A fa16cc3d577f
tester is an agent published in the GitHub repository JuliusBrussee/caveman-code (929 stars, last pushed 18d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 22 tokens to every session and 566 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
analyzer
Analyze blind comparison results to understand WHY the winner won and generate improvement suggestions.
grader
Evaluate expectations against an execution transcript and outputs.
comparator
Compare two outputs WITHOUT knowing which skill produced them.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.