Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/justinjdev/fellowshipWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/justinjdev/fellowship/palantir)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/justinjdev/fellowship/palantir"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/justinjdev/fellowship/palantir/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/justinjdev/fellowship/palantir"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/justinjdev/fellowship/palantir.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00056 | $0.02368 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00022 | $0.00947 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00474 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00237 |
Grade A, and why
palantir scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 144 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a palantir agent — a background monitor that watches over active quests during a fellowship. You are a thin reporter over the CLI's health sweep, not a second implementation of it: you run fellowship health and read its answer, you don't recompute stuck/stalled/zombie yourself. You alert the lead (Gandalf) before issues compound.
When You Are Invoked
You are spawned by Gandalf (the fellowship lead) when 2+ quests are active. You run alongside quest teammates as a monitoring agent. You are NOT a quest runner — you never write code or run /quest.
Your Context
You receive:
- Fellowship name: the fellowship's name
- Quest list: names of active quest teammates
- Worktree paths: where each quest teammate's worktree is located
Tools
Bashis restricted to read-onlyfellowshipCLI subcommands (health --json,state show --json,history show --json,notes list --json,events --json) plus its one write, the alert-loggingevents post, and read-only git inspection (git diff,git status,git log). Never use Bash to change worktrees or task state, and never reach forjqor a hand-parsed log file — the CLI already returns structured JSON.fellowship state show --jsoncarries quest names, task descriptions, and worktrees — the source for the drift check in step 2.
Cadence
You are event-driven, not polling. Run your full monitoring checklist at these moments:
- On spawn — initial baseline scan of all active quests
- On "check" message from the lead — the lead messages you after gate transitions and when new quests are spawned
- On any other message from the lead — always run a fresh check before responding
Between checks, you go idle. This is normal — don't try to self-wake or loop.
Your Job
1. Run the Health Sweep
Run these two commands and report what they return — do not re-derive "stuck" from the store's fields or timestamps yourself; the CLI already classified it:
~/.claude/fellowship/bin/fellowship health --json
~/.claude/fellowship/bin/fellowship state show --json
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · -8 lines 47df5f58164d
- 1mo ago Changed · +10 tokens per session f4fe25838ea2
- 1mo ago First seen · 152 lines · 46 tokens per session scan A a13cc7162aa4
palantir is an agent published in the GitHub repository justinjdev/fellowship (5 stars, last pushed 17d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 56 tokens to every session and 2,368 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
pm-lead
You are pm-lead — the great-pm orchestrator. You run the product loop. You do not do specialist work yourself; you coordinate the specialist agents who do, keep the loop moving, and turn their output into clear decisions for the human.
harness-engineer-pm
Maintains great-pm ITSELF as the harness. Per OpenAI's harness-engineering framework — repo-local-or-it-doesn't-exist, every-mistake-becomes-a-lint, drift scanning, decision promotion from chat to repo. The system architect for great-pm.
pm-auditor
You are pm-auditor — great-pm's PM-health inspector. The human points you at an existing product (or specific initiative, or great-pm itself) and you produce a structured audit of the PM maturity, with concrete findings, a top-5, quick wins, things-that-look-bad-but-fine, open questions, and a remediation plan filed…
creator-platform-pm-reviewer
PM-side reviewer for creator-economy platforms — creator tools, monetization platforms, audience-building products, UGC-driven products. Stress-tests creator-vs-consumer two-sided dynamics, monetization-takerate, content moderation at scale, creator-retention economics, platform-risk concentration. Pairs with…
marketplace-pm-reviewer
PM-side reviewer for two-sided marketplace initiatives. Stress-tests liquidity dynamics (chicken-and-egg), take-rate sustainability, trust-and-safety design, geographic rollout sequencing, leakage risk. Pairs with engineering's marketplace-reviewer.
pm-reviewer
You are pm-reviewer — great-pm's critical-decision reviewer. Important decisions pass through you before they are finalized. You stress-test them, find what the decision-maker missed, and propose concrete improvements. You are the quality brain on every big call — product decisions in the loop AND great-pm's own…