Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to juyamagu/azure-updates-mcp-server. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/juyamagu/azure-updates-mcp-server/main/.github/agents/speckit.implement.agent.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/juyamagu/azure-updates-mcp-serverWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/juyamagu/azure-updates-mcp-server/speckit.implement)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/juyamagu/azure-updates-mcp-server/speckit.implement"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/juyamagu/azure-updates-mcp-server/speckit.implement.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00014 | $0.02039 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00007 | $0.01019 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00408 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00204 |
Grade A, and why
speckit.implement scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
86% identical to speckit.implement — 65 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 140 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
User Input
$ARGUMENTS
You MUST consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty).
Standards
Refer to .specify/memory/constitution.md for implementation best practices and guidelines.
Outline
-
Run
.specify/scripts/bash/check-prerequisites.sh --json --require-tasks --include-tasksfrom repo root and parse FEATURE_DIR and AVAILABLE_DOCS list. All paths must be absolute. For single quotes in args like "I'm Groot", use escape syntax: e.g 'I'''m Groot' (or double-quote if possible: "I'm Groot"). -
Check checklists status (if FEATURE_DIR/checklists/ exists):
-
Scan all checklist files in the checklists/ directory
-
For each checklist, count:
- Total items: All lines matching
- [ ]or- [X]or- [x] - Completed items: Lines matching
- [X]or- [x] - Incomplete items: Lines matching
- [ ]
- Total items: All lines matching
-
Create a status table:
| Checklist | Total | Completed | Incomplete | Status | |-----------|-------|-----------|------------|--------| | ux.md | 12 | 12 | 0 | ✓ PASS | | test.md | 8 | 5 | 3 | ✗ FAIL | | security.md | 6 | 6 | 0 | ✓ PASS | -
Calculate overall status:
- PASS: All checklists have 0 incomplete items
- FAIL: One or more checklists have incomplete items
-
If any checklist is incomplete:
- Display the table with incomplete item counts
- STOP and ask: "Some checklists are incomplete. Do you want to proceed with implementation anyway? (yes/no)"
- Wait for user response before continuing
- If user says "no" or "wait" or "stop", halt execution
- If user says "yes" or "proceed" or "continue", proceed to step 3
-
If all checklists are complete:
- Display the table showing all checklists passed
- Automatically proceed to step 3
-
-
Load and analyze the implementation context:
- REQUIRED: Read tasks.md for the complete task list and execution plan
- REQUIRED: Read plan.md for tech stack, architecture, and file structure
- IF EXISTS: Read data-model.md for entities and relationships
- IF EXISTS: Read contracts/ for API specifications and test requirements
- IF EXISTS: Read research.md for technical decisions and constraints
- IF EXISTS: Read quickstart.md for integration scenarios
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 140 lines · 14 tokens per session scan A b41a7e568e9c
speckit.implement is an agent published in the GitHub repository juyamagu/azure-updates-mcp-server (0 stars, last pushed 8mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 14 tokens to every session and 2,039 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 86% identical to speckit.implement, differing in 65 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.
Context7-Expert
Expert in latest library versions, best practices, and correct syntax using up-to-date documentation.
code-reviewer
Performs thorough code reviews for the Notebooks in the Cookbook repo, focusing on Python/Jupyter best practices, and project-specific standards. Use this agent proactively after writing any significant code changes, especially when modifying notebooks, Github Actions, and scripts.