python-reviewer

A reviewer for Python code, focusing on types, security, common mistakes, and the usual Python style.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review Python changes for type issues, security risks, common pitfalls, and idiomatic solutions.
Why use it?
It helps catch errors and unsafe or hard-to-maintain patterns before they cause problems.

Agent

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/jwiegley/claude-prompts/python-reviewer
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jwiegley/claude-prompts
Per session 22 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 988 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 1 finding. Scan, not verified.
Origin unknown No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00022 $0.00988
Opus 5 $0.00011 $0.00494
Sonnet 5 $0.00004 $0.00198
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00099

Measured 3d ago against content hash 845e3d874521, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

python-reviewer scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Runs shell commandslowCapability

Expected in a hook, worth knowing in a rule or an instructions file.

- `subprocess.shell=True` with variable input → command injection
agents/python-reviewer.md · 90 lines

The source is not reproduced here

No licence file

A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.

Read it on GitHub

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 3d ago First seen · 90 lines · 22 tokens per session scan A 845e3d874521

Subscribe to this mod's changes

python-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository jwiegley/claude-prompts (20 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 22 tokens to every session and 988 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (runs shell commands). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.