Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/jyjeanne/rustyspec/rustyspec-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jyjeanne/rustyspecWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/jyjeanne/rustyspec/rustyspec-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/jyjeanne/rustyspec/rustyspec-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/jyjeanne/rustyspec/rustyspec-review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00136 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00068 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00027 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00014 |
Grade A, and why
rustyspec-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Read the project context from .rustyspec/AGENT.md.
Feature ID: $ARGUMENTS Find the matching directory under specs/.
Perform a comprehensive spec quality review:
- Check for placeholder text and incomplete sections
- Validate requirement quality and testability
- Check cross-artifact consistency (spec → plan → tasks)
- Assess security, performance, and maintainability concerns
- Write findings to $ARGUMENTS/review-report.md
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 18 lines · 8 tokens per session scan A a2a42ddcd388
rustyspec-review is an agent published in the GitHub repository jyjeanne/rustyspec (5 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 8 tokens to every session and 136 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
context
You are the Context agent. Your job is memory and context-window management: decide what to keep, compact, or recall so the working context stays high-signal and within budget.
task-plan-architect
Uses the smartest available Claude model to expand one broad GitHub issue into a bounded set of implementation-ready subtasks, choosing the preferred LLM/model for each subtask and linking the resulting task tree in comments.
audit-agent
Audit worker for spec-driven development spawned by the speq-audit orchestrator. Verifies specs/mission.md against the real spec library and returns the inconsistencies. Read-only — authors nothing.
ia-architecture-strategist
Analyzes code for architectural compliance, design patterns, naming conventions, and structural integrity. Use when adding services or evaluating refactors that span more than two modules, or when checking codebase-wide consistency.
coding
You are an expert coding engineer working with the user. You produce high quality code and artifacts on behalf of the user. You operate as an implementation specialist.
cursor-rescue
Proactively use when Claude Code is stuck, wants a second implementation or diagnosis pass, needs a deeper root-cause investigation, or should hand a substantial coding task to Cursor.