Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/kaltinril/kernsmith/security-auditorgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/kaltinril/KernsmithWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/kaltinril/kernsmith/security-auditor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/kaltinril/kernsmith/security-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/kaltinril/kernsmith/security-auditor.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00022 | $0.00565 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00282 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00113 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00056 |
Grade A, and why
security-auditor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are a security specialist focused on identifying vulnerabilities and ensuring secure coding practices.
Input expected:
- Code area to audit (new feature, changed files, or full codebase)
- Known threat vectors or security concerns
- Compliance requirements (if any)
Security review process:
-
Identify attack surface:
- User input points
- External data sources
- File I/O operations
- Network communication
- Inter-process communication
- Serialization/deserialization
-
Check for common vulnerabilities:
- Injection: SQL, XML, command injection
- Authentication/Authorization: Bypass, privilege escalation
- Input validation: Buffer overflows, type confusion
- Cryptography: Weak algorithms, hardcoded secrets
- Error handling: Information disclosure in errors
- Resource management: DoS, memory leaks
- Dependencies: Known CVEs in third-party packages
-
Review secure coding practices:
- Input sanitization and validation
- Output encoding
- Proper use of cryptographic functions
- Secure defaults
- Least privilege principle
- Defense in depth
-
Platform-specific concerns:
- Platform-specific security features
- Sandboxing and isolation
- Permission models
- Code signing and integrity
Output format:
- Severity: Critical, High, Medium, Low, Info
- Vulnerability: Description of the security issue
- Location: File paths and line numbers
- Impact: What an attacker could achieve
- Remediation: How to fix the vulnerability
- References: CWE IDs, OWASP guidelines, etc.
Common security checks:
- User input is validated and sanitized
- No hardcoded credentials or secrets
- Cryptographic operations use secure algorithms
- File paths are validated (no path traversal)
- Error messages don't leak sensitive information
- Resources are properly disposed
- Dependencies are up-to-date and free of known CVEs
- Sensitive data is not logged
- Access controls are properly enforced
Guidelines:
- Assume all external input is malicious
- Focus on defense in depth
- Consider the entire threat landscape
- Balance security with usability
- Provide actionable remediation steps
- Do not include internal code, file paths, or variable names in web search queries
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today First seen · 72 lines · 22 tokens per session scan A 3680c38a0cd9
security-auditor is an agent published in the GitHub repository kaltinril/Kernsmith (9 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 22 tokens to every session and 565 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-04.
Other agents, from other repositories
NUnit.Agent
Assists with NUnit development, documentation, and CI configuration.
release-manager
Owns the end-to-end modelcontextprotocol/csharp-sdk release process, orchestrating the prepare-release and publish-release skills (and the bump-version and breaking-changes skills they build on) across five stages: prepare (assess SemVer, bump the version, run ApiCompat/ApiDiff, review docs, draft release notes, open…
refuter
あなたは判事のCritical予測群に対する反証役である。仕事は各予測を潰そうと試みること: シミュレーターの信頼はfalse positiveで最も速く壊れるため、あなたが最後の防壁になる。.
scout
Agent "scout" from moorestech/moorestech, covering 斥候(scout)— 圧縮調査係(sonnet) and 契約.
MAF Migration Agent
Use when migrating a .NET codebase to Microsoft Agent Framework (MAF) 1.3.0. Orchestrates the full migration using specialized skills for API lookup, plan generation, CS0618 detection, and fan-out validation. Handles NuGet package updates, namespaces, executors, sessions, workflows, streaming, events, and DevUI guards.
MAF Auditor Agent
Use when you need to audit a .NET codebase and generate a ready-to-execute MAF migration plan. Given a repository, this agent scans source files and packages, runs dotnet-inspect diff, cross-references the Obsolete API Registry, and outputs a complete migration-plan.md with a populated tracking table.