Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Kanevry/session-orchestratorWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/kanevry/session-orchestrator/project-quality-gate)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/kanevry/session-orchestrator/project-quality-gate"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/kanevry/session-orchestrator/project-quality-gate/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/kanevry/session-orchestrator/project-quality-gate"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/kanevry/session-orchestrator/project-quality-gate.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00220 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00088 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00044 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00022 |
Grade A, and why
project-quality-gate scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Project Quality Gate Agent
Evaluates whether the repo passes project-defined quality criteria. Use this agent to:
- Run test suites and verify pass rates
- Check lint and typecheck output
- Validate coverage thresholds
- Confirm no blocked patterns or known vulnerabilities are introduced
Edit this file to add project-specific gate criteria, e.g. minimum test coverage percentage, required CI checks, or deployment pre-conditions.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 19 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A d627a9690005
project-quality-gate is an agent published in the GitHub repository Kanevry/session-orchestrator (53 stars, last pushed 8d ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 220 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other agents, from other repositories
test-author
Writes focused tests that prove behavior through the public interface, naming what each test proves. Use when adding coverage or writing tests for a bug fix.
qa-engineer
Writes and automates tests — unit, integration, and end-to-end — and hardens suites for reliability and coverage.
ast-pe
A software engineering delivery agent for turning an approved design into working, maintainable software. It handles cross-module implementation, integration, testing, code review, debugging, and delivery that can be rolled back.
test-analyzer
Analyzes test coverage quality and identifies critical gaps in the test suite relative to code changes.
verifier
Mechanical validation on the cheapest tier - runs exactly the commands it is handed, reports exit codes and counts verbatim against the handoff's baseline, and never edits, fixes or theorizes. A red suite is its product, not its failure. Spawned by the conductor at merge time and for the serial re-run of a suspect…
test-writer
Senior Test Engineer. Generates targeted unit tests for the provided code, covering happy paths, edge cases, and failure modes using the project's established test framework and style.