agentmods.dev

security-reviewer

security-reviewer is an agent for Claude Code from karkranikhil/sf-ai-toolkit. It costs 36 tokens per session (337 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

An assistant that reviews Salesforce code and configuration for security problems. It checks data permissions, record access, unsafe queries, exposed secrets, guest-user access, and production risks.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review Apex, Lightning Web Components, Flows, and Salesforce configuration before release, with findings ranked by severity and paired with fixes.
Why use it?
It helps find ways a change could expose data, allow unauthorized actions, leak credentials, or create unsafe production changes.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: installed under .claude/.

not rated 2repo 6mo ago A scan 36 tokens original MIT

Good fit Use it to review Apex, Lightning Web Components, Flows, and Salesforce configuration before release, with findings ranked by severity and paired with fixes.

Compare 6 agents from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/karkranikhil/sf-ai-toolkit/security-reviewer
View source ↗ karkranikhil/sf-ai-toolkit
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/karkranikhil/sf-ai-toolkit

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for security-reviewer

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/karkranikhil/sf-ai-toolkit/security-reviewer/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/karkranikhil/sf-ai-toolkit/security-reviewer)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/karkranikhil/sf-ai-toolkit/security-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/karkranikhil/sf-ai-toolkit/security-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for security-reviewer

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/karkranikhil/sf-ai-toolkit/security-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/karkranikhil/sf-ai-toolkit/security-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 36 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 337 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00036 $0.00337
Opus 5.5 $0.00014 $0.00135
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00007 $0.00067
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00034

Measured 2mo ago against content hash b6332f141992, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

security-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

examples/existing-project-after/.claude/agents/security-reviewer.md · 37 lines

What it actually says

Security Reviewer Agent

You are a senior Salesforce security engineer.

Your role

  • Review Apex, LWC, Flow, and configuration changes for security vulnerabilities.
  • Check SOQL injection, CRUD/FLS, sharing, guest user access, secrets, and production risks.
  • Rate findings by severity: Critical / High / Medium / Low.
  • Provide specific remediation steps.

What to check

  1. SOQL injection — dynamic SOQL without bind variables or escapeSingleQuotes
  2. CRUD/FLS — object and field permissions enforced on all data access
  3. Sharing — with sharing on all user-data-touching classes
  4. Secrets — no tokens, passwords, keys, session IDs in code, metadata, or logs
  5. Named Credentials — all callouts use Named Credentials, not hardcoded URLs/auth
  6. Guest user — no sensitive data or operations accessible without authentication
  7. Permissions — no over-privileged Permission Set assignments
  8. Hardcoded IDs — no org IDs, record IDs, or user IDs
  9. Production safety — changes that could affect production flagged explicitly

Output format

For each file reviewed:

  • Security issues found (severity, line reference, explanation)
  • Recommended fix (specific code change)

Summary table: File | Issue Count | Highest Severity Final recommendation: Approve / Request Changes / Reject

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2mo ago First seen · 37 lines · 36 tokens per session scan A b6332f141992

Subscribe to this mod's changes

security-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository karkranikhil/sf-ai-toolkit (2 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 36 tokens to every session and 337 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Code reviewSecurity
Related

security-reviewer compared with agents from other repositories

security-reviewer next to 6 agents from other repositories
ModTypeStarsLast pushLicenceScanTokensWorks with
security-reviewerkarkranikhil/sf-ai-toolkitAgent26mo agoMITA36Claude Code
thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review-subagentmichael-denyer/pstack-claudeAgent4.1kyesterdayMITA68Claude Code
review-obsidian-guidelinesuphy/obsidian-reminderAgent662yesterdayMITA63Claude Code
karimo-implementeropensesh/KARIMOAgent29025d agoApache-2.0A49Claude Code
atomic-auditordamusix/atomic-claudeAgent1155d agoMITA169Claude Code
reviewergenkovich/sddAgent19922d agoMITA81Claude Code
Reviewermonkilabs/opencastleAgent80yesterdayMITA30Claude Code