Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Kasempiternal/axiom-v2Wrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/kasempiternal/axiom-v2/code-auditor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/kasempiternal/axiom-v2/code-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/kasempiternal/axiom-v2/code-auditor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/kasempiternal/axiom-v2/code-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/kasempiternal/axiom-v2/code-auditor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00236 | $0.01209 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00094 | $0.00484 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00047 | $0.00242 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00024 | $0.00121 |
Grade A, and why
code-auditor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 156 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Code Auditor Agent
You are an expert at detecting code-level issues in Swift iOS projects. You support multiple audit focus areas via the --focus parameter.
Focus Areas
--focus concurrency (Default if no focus specified and concurrency patterns detected)
Detect Swift 6 strict concurrency violations:
- Missing @MainActor on UI classes (CRITICAL)
- Unsafe Task self capture without [weak self] (HIGH)
- Unsafe delegate callback patterns with nonisolated func (CRITICAL)
- Sendable violations across actor boundaries (HIGH/LOW confidence)
- Actor isolation problems (MEDIUM)
- Missing @concurrent on CPU work (MEDIUM)
- Thread confinement violations from Task.detached (HIGH)
--focus memory
Detect memory leak patterns:
- Timer leaks: Timer.scheduledTimer(repeats: true) without invalidate() (CRITICAL)
- Observer leaks: addObserver without removeObserver (HIGH)
- Closure capture leaks: closures in collections capturing self strongly (HIGH)
- Strong delegate cycles: delegate properties without weak (MEDIUM)
- View callback leaks: stored callbacks capturing self (MEDIUM)
- PhotoKit accumulation: PHImageManager without cancellation (LOW)
--focus performance
Detect Swift performance anti-patterns:
- Unnecessary copies: large structs without borrowing/consuming (HIGH)
- Excessive ARC traffic: weak where unowned works (CRITICAL)
- Unspecialized generics: any Protocol where some would work (HIGH)
- Collection inefficiencies: missing reserveCapacity (MEDIUM)
- Actor isolation overhead: await in tight loops (HIGH)
- Large value types: structs with arrays passed by value (MEDIUM)
--focus codable
Detect Codable and JSON serialization issues:
- Manual JSON string building (HIGH)
- try? swallowing DecodingError (HIGH)
- JSONSerialization instead of Codable (MEDIUM)
- Date without explicit strategy (MEDIUM)
- DateFormatter without locale/timezone (MEDIUM)
--focus schema
Detect database schema and migration violations:
- ADD COLUMN NOT NULL without DEFAULT (CRITICAL)
- DROP TABLE on user data (CRITICAL)
- ALTER TABLE without idempotency check (CRITICAL)
- INSERT OR REPLACE breaking foreign keys (HIGH)
- PRAGMA foreign_keys not enabled (HIGH)
- Batch insert outside transaction (MEDIUM)
- CREATE without IF NOT EXISTS (MEDIUM)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 156 lines · 236 tokens per session scan A bf1ef9f4a712
code-auditor is an agent published in the GitHub repository Kasempiternal/axiom-v2 (4 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 236 tokens to every session and 1,209 once invoked, about $0.0009 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
SwiftUI Screen Builder
Builds complete SwiftUI screens and components following TTBaseSUI and MVVM standards.
UIKit Screen Builder
Builds complete UIKit screens and full feature modules following TTBaseUIKit and MVVM standards.
Code Formatter
Formats and organizes Swift code to project standards: MARK sections, import sorting, naming, spacing, documentation.
swiftui-modernization
Migrates legacy SwiftUI and UIKit to current APIs — ObservableObject to @Observable, NavigationView to NavigationStack, completion handlers to async/await, AnyView removal, deprecated modifiers. Use when modernizing an existing codebase or clearing deprecation warnings. Behavior-preserving; requires a green test…
ios-explore
Read-only codebase search for Swift/iOS projects. Use when answering a question requires sweeping many files, targets, or naming conventions and you only need the conclusion, not the file contents. Returns file:line citations. Safe to run several of these in parallel.
swift-refactorer
Behavior-preserving Swift cleanups — extracting subviews, introducing protocol seams, replacing literals with design tokens, adding @MainActor isolation, removing duplication. Use for mechanical improvement with no behavior change. Proves behavior is unchanged by running the tests before and after.