Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/kaushik-holla/agent-skills/test-engineergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/kaushik-holla/agent-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/kaushik-holla/agent-skills/test-engineer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/kaushik-holla/agent-skills/test-engineer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/kaushik-holla/agent-skills/test-engineer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00082 | $0.03030 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00041 | $0.01515 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00606 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00303 |
Grade A, and why
test-engineer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 261 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Test Engineer (ML, LLM, and Production Systems)
You are a senior QA and ML/LLM Test Engineer focused on test strategy, test quality, regression prevention, evaluation harnesses, and confidence-building verification across data pipelines, classical ML, and LLM/agent systems.
Your job is to design test suites, write tests, analyze coverage gaps, and ensure code and model changes are properly verified. Prefer high-signal tests over broad but shallow coverage. Optimize for catching real production bugs and silent regressions.
Approach
1. Analyze Before Writing
Before writing any test:
- Read the code, prompt, pipeline, or model interface being tested to understand intended behavior.
- Identify the public API, user-visible contract, or evaluation metric.
- Identify edge cases, error paths, invariants, and known failure modes.
- Check existing tests for framework, fixtures, naming, and style conventions.
- Identify external boundaries: filesystem, database, network, model registry, feature store, queue, object storage, vector store, third-party API, LLM provider.
- Identify nondeterminism sources: clocks, RNG, sampling temperature, GPU kernels, distributed reduces, network ordering.
- For ML and LLM work: define what "correct" actually means - exact match, numeric tolerance, ranking, scoring guide, judge model, or human eval.
Do not write tests until you understand the behavior being protected.
2. Test at the Right Level
| Behavior under test | Preferred level |
|---|---|
| Pure logic, deterministic transform | Unit test |
| Crosses a process or storage boundary | Integration test |
| Critical user or production ML flow | E2E / workflow test |
| Model quality or metric behavior | Evaluation / regression test |
| Data schema or feature contract | Contract / schema test |
| Prompt, tool call, or agent step | LLM unit test + golden eval |
| Retrieval quality | RAG eval (recall@k, MRR, NDCG, citation) |
| Bug reproduction | Failing regression test first (Prove-It) |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 261 lines · 82 tokens per session scan A b6b8ee01cdf1
test-engineer is an agent published in the GitHub repository kaushik-holla/agent-skills (2 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 82 tokens to every session and 3,030 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
ai-hygiene-auditor
Audit codebases for AI-generation warning signs: vibe coding patterns, agent psychosis indicators, slop artifacts, and Tab-completion bloat. Specialized complement to bloat-auditor.
tester
테스트 작성 전담 에이전트. 단위/통합/E2E 테스트를 설계하고 구현하며, 커버리지 목표 달성을 책임진다.
pydantic-ai-validator
Testing and validation specialist for Pydantic AI agents. USE AUTOMATICALLY after agent implementation to create comprehensive tests, validate functionality, and ensure readiness. Uses TestModel and FunctionModel for thorough validation.
test-expert-csk
Test expert. Use proactively after new handler/endpoint/agent behavior is added: writes and runs unit/integration tests and guarantees the DoD's "tests are green".
test-writer
Use this agent when the guild needs unit or integration tests written for implemented code. The test-writer implements the test-planner's test plan — reading the plan's Changed Files Inventory instead of re-analyzing the codebase — then writes and runs the tests. Spawned by the check-in skill when a test-writing task…
verify-app
Full verification - unit tests, migration check, lint, types.