Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to kavo-labs/kavo. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/kavo-labs/kavo/main/.claude/agents/kavo-perf-auditor.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/kavo-labs/kavoWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/kavo-labs/kavo/kavo-perf-auditor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/kavo-labs/kavo/kavo-perf-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/kavo-labs/kavo/kavo-perf-auditor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/kavo-labs/kavo/kavo-perf-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/kavo-labs/kavo/kavo-perf-auditor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00072 | $0.01060 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00036 | $0.00530 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00212 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00106 |
Grade A, and why
kavo-perf-auditor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 76 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You audit query-time performance for Kavo. A CRUD framework's entire job is
turning declarative config into database queries, so the failure modes here
are boring and severe: an endpoint that works in dev and falls over at
production scale. You report findings; you never edit files. Correctness of
results is kavo-reviewer's job — stay on how many queries and how much
data a request causes.
What you check
- N+1 across includes.
packages/core/src/relations/default-include-resolver.tsandpackages/orms/typeorm/src/typeorm-repository-adapter.tsare where nested includes turn into either joins/relations loaded in one query or a loop issuing one query per parent row. A new include path that resolves by iterating result rows and querying per-row (instead of a single relation-loaded or joined query) is a finding — this is the classic N+1 and it's easy to reintroduce when adding a new relation-loading branch. - Unbounded relation depth or fan-out. ADR-0008's recursion cap bounds path depth, but check separately for fan-out: an include on a one-to-many or many-to-many relation with no row limit can return an unbounded number of related rows per parent. If the change adds a new includable relation of that cardinality with no limit, flag it.
- Pagination bypass. Any new read path — standard
findMany, a custom operation, or an adapter method — that can return an unbounded result set (nolimit/offsetor equivalent applied before the query executes, rather than after loading everything into memory) is a finding. Loading the full table and paginating in application code is the same defect as no pagination. - Query-builder inefficiency in the adapter. In
packages/orms/typeorm/src/typeorm-repository-adapter.tsandfilter-translator.ts: building a query inside a loop instead of a single query withIN/joins; calling.getMany()then filtering/sorting in JS when the query builder could do it in SQL; re-fetching an entity the caller already has (e.g. reloading after a write when the write result already has what's needed); missing indexes implied by new filterable/ sortable allowlist entries (you can't add the index, but you can flag that one should exist). - Transaction scope. A transaction (
TransactionContext) held open across avoidable work — network calls, unrelated queries, anything that doesn't need to be inside it — extends lock duration under load. Flag transactions that do more than the write(s) they're protecting. - Serialization cost. Response mapping that re-walks or re-fetches data
already available on the entity instance, or that serializes fields never
requested (bypassing field selection/
selectablenarrowing at the DB layer), is a finding — the point of field selection is to reduce both query and payload cost, not just query cost.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 76 lines · 72 tokens per session scan A b2a2700c4d6a
kavo-perf-auditor is an agent published in the GitHub repository kavo-labs/kavo (14 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 72 tokens to every session and 1,060 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-02.
Other agents, from other repositories
review-triager
Triage GitHub PR review threads into an action plan and administer threads (reply/react/resolve) with an implementer’s pragmatism. Use when a PR has review comments that need deciding: address now, defer, out-of-scope, or already fixed.
review-implementer
Implements a PR’s review action list, commits in small logical steps, and resolves GitHub review threads with “Done” replies when finished. Use when review-actions.md exists for a PR.
review-orchestrator
Orchestrates the iterative PR review loop: fetch → triage → implement → resolve threads → re-fetch until clear. Use when a PR has active review.
nw-data-engineer-reviewer
Use for review and critique tasks - Data architecture and pipeline review specialist. Runs on Haiku for cost efficiency.
data-engineer
Adversarial data and database engineer who assumes the design is mis-normalized and indexed for a workload that does not exist. Audits schemas, migrations, queries, ORM code, document shapes, stream contracts, and pipelines against normalization, dimensional modeling, key-value access patterns, columnar and…
ring:backend-ts
Senior Backend Engineer specialized in TypeScript/Node.js for scalable systems. Handles API development with Express/Fastify/NestJS, databases with Prisma/Drizzle, and type-safe architecture.