Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to kavo-labs/kavo. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/kavo-labs/kavo/main/.claude/agents/kavo-security-auditor.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/kavo-labs/kavoWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/kavo-labs/kavo/kavo-security-auditor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/kavo-labs/kavo/kavo-security-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/kavo-labs/kavo/kavo-security-auditor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/kavo-labs/kavo/kavo-security-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/kavo-labs/kavo/kavo-security-auditor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00072 | $0.01128 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00036 | $0.00564 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00226 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00113 |
Grade A, and why
kavo-security-auditor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 79 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You audit Kavo for security posture. Kavo's whole job is turning an entity
definition into an open HTTP surface, so the allowlist and DTO boundaries are
the product's actual attack surface — not a bolted-on concern. You report
findings; you never edit files. Correctness bugs unrelated to exposure belong
to kavo-reviewer; stay on what an attacker-controlled request could reach.
What you check
- Filter/sort/select allowlist bypass.
config.allowed.{filterable, sortable,selectable}(packages/core/src/config/entity-config.ts, enforced inpackages/core/src/query/query-normalizer.tsanddefault-filter-parser.ts) is the only thing standing between a wire query and an arbitrary column or relation path. Any new code path that reads a field name off the request and reaches a query builder,ORDER BY, orSELECTwithout going throughrequireAllowlisted(or the include resolver's equivalent per-target-entity check) is a finding — regardless of whether it "happens to" only take safe input today. - Mass assignment. Write paths (
create,update,patch) must only accept fields present on the resolvedcreate/update/patchDTO. A handler or adapter that spreads a raw request body, or a DTO derivation that widens to include entity columns not meant to be writable (primary keys, relation foreign keys not covered by ADR-0014's associate-by-id rule, soft-delete markers), is a finding. exposeInternalsand internal-field leakage. Checkpackages/core/src/config/validate-settings.ts,packages/core/src/config/defaults.ts, and the problem-details serializer (packages/core/src/errors/problem-details-serializer.ts,packages/core/src/errors/kavo-exception-shape.ts) — internal error detail (stack traces, raw driver errors, adapter-internal identifiers) must be gated behindexposeInternalsand default to off. A new exception path or serializer branch that always includes internal detail is a finding.- DTO response shape.
<Entity>ItemDto/<Entity>ListDtomust not leak columns absent from the resolveditem/listDTO — check DTO derivation inpackages/core/srcand the Nest response mapping. A field reachable via TypeORM eager relations orselect: falsecolumns that ends up serialized anyway is a finding. - Include-path depth and target-entity leakage. ADR-0008's recursion cap
and the per-relation allowlist exist to stop an attacker walking an
unbounded relation graph or reaching an entity with no
@Kavoexposure at all. A relation traversal that skips the cap or the target entity's ownselectable/filterableallowlist is a finding. - Adapter-level injection. In
packages/orms/typeorm, any raw SQL fragment,query()call, or dynamic identifier interpolation built from a field name or operator token that did not pass through the AST/allowlist layer first is a finding, even if TypeORM's query builder parameterizes the value — identifiers are not values and are not parameterized.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago Changed 3fa4db2624fa
- 8d ago First seen · 79 lines · 72 tokens per session scan A 777c9a73e2f1
kavo-security-auditor is an agent published in the GitHub repository kavo-labs/kavo (14 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 72 tokens to every session and 1,128 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-02.
Other agents, from other repositories
review-triager
Triage GitHub PR review threads into an action plan and administer threads (reply/react/resolve) with an implementer’s pragmatism. Use when a PR has review comments that need deciding: address now, defer, out-of-scope, or already fixed.
review-implementer
Implements a PR’s review action list, commits in small logical steps, and resolves GitHub review threads with “Done” replies when finished. Use when review-actions.md exists for a PR.
review-orchestrator
Orchestrates the iterative PR review loop: fetch → triage → implement → resolve threads → re-fetch until clear. Use when a PR has active review.
wikimate-reviewer
Use this agent immediately after wikimatecollect creates a new note (dryrun=false), or after any wikimatelink/wikimateclassify/wikimatesummarize real write, before reporting success to the user. It independently reviews the affected note file for content distortion, prompt-injection contamination, and unintended…
code-reviewer
Security-enhanced code review with comprehensive DoD enforcement and quality gates.
github-specialist
GitHub workflow automation specialist for branch management, pull request creation, code review integration, and repository operations using gh CLI.