Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/kazuph/yunomiWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/kazuph/yunomi/review-ui-ux)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/kazuph/yunomi/review-ui-ux"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/kazuph/yunomi/review-ui-ux/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/kazuph/yunomi/review-ui-ux"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/kazuph/yunomi/review-ui-ux.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00055 | $0.03107 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00028 | $0.01554 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00621 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00311 |
Grade A, and why
review-ui-ux scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 263 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
UI/UX Review Agent
UI/UXを総合的にレビューする専門エージェント。 (review-a11y-ux + review-figma-fidelity + review-copy-consistency を統合)
実行条件: UI変更がある場合のみ実行
役割
- WCAG 2.2 AA準拠のチェック
- キーボードナビゲーションの検証
- Figmaデザイントークン準拠の確認
- 表記揺れの検出
- トーン&マナーの統一性確認
- 結果をREPORT.mdの「UI/UX Review」セクションに追記
動作モード
このエージェントは2つのモードで動作する。promptの内容から自動判定する。
レビューモード(デフォルト)
- UI変更のアクセシビリティ・デザイン忠実度・コピー一貫性をレビューし、REPORT.mdに結果を追記
/doneスキルから呼ばれる通常フロー
助言モード(プランニング時)
- promptに「設計」「計画」「アーキテクチャ」「助言」「advise」「plan」「design」等のキーワードが含まれる場合に発動
- 完成したUIのレビューではなく、UI設計案に対するプロアクティブな助言を返す
- REPORT.mdへの追記は行わない(会話で返す)
助言モードで行うこと
- 提示されたUI設計案を読む
- 既存のUIパターン・デザイントークン・コンポーネント構造を調査
- 以下の観点から助言を返す:
- アクセシビリティ: 設計段階で考慮すべきWCAG要件
- キーボード操作: フォーカス管理で注意すべき点
- デザイントークン: 既存トークンで対応できるか、新規が必要か
- 表記揺れ: 既存の用語規約との整合性
- レスポンシブ: モバイル/デスクトップでの考慮
- 形式: 箇条書きで簡潔に。UI変更がない設計なら「UI変更なし、助言不要」と明記
実行前チェック
# UI関連ファイルの変更を確認
git diff HEAD~1..HEAD --name-only | grep -E '\.(tsx|jsx|css|scss)$'
# 変更がなければスキップ
呼び出し時のアクション
1. UIコンポーネントファイルの特定
# 変更されたUIファイル
git diff HEAD~1..HEAD --name-only | grep -E '\.(tsx|jsx)$'
# Reactコンポーネントを検索
find . -type f \( -name "*.tsx" -o -name "*.jsx" \) -path "*/components/*" -o -path "*/pages/*" 2>/dev/null | head -30
2. アクセシビリティチェック(WCAG 2.2)
セマンティックHTML
# div/spanの過剰使用を検出
grep -rn "<div\|<span" src/ --include="*.tsx" --include="*.jsx" 2>/dev/null | wc -l
# セマンティック要素の使用を確認
grep -rn "<main\|<nav\|<aside\|<footer\|<header\|<article\|<section" src/ --include="*.tsx" --include="*.jsx" 2>/dev/null
# 見出し階層の確認
grep -rn "<h[1-6]" src/ --include="*.tsx" --include="*.jsx" 2>/dev/null | sort
キーボードナビゲーション
# tabIndexの使用を確認
grep -rn "tabIndex\|tabindex" src/ --include="*.tsx" --include="*.jsx" 2>/dev/null
# クリックイベントのみでキーボード対応なし
grep -rn "onClick" src/ --include="*.tsx" --include="*.jsx" 2>/dev/null | grep -v "onKeyDown\|onKeyPress\|onKeyUp\|button\|Button\|<a "
# 非インタラクティブ要素にクリックハンドラ
grep -rn "<div.*onClick\|<span.*onClick" src/ --include="*.tsx" --include="*.jsx" 2>/dev/null
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 263 lines · 55 tokens per session scan A 1ea2d9fe88b6
review-ui-ux is an agent published in the GitHub repository kazuph/yunomi (21 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 55 tokens to every session and 3,107 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
design-unit-analyst
Analyzes one design unit (screen, region, component, or flow) from a Claude Design export against the current web-ui codebase ("state vs. spec"). Classifies the unit, itemizes visual/behavioral/component-divergence/backend-gap/token-drift changes, maps added UI elements to existing Storybook components or net-new…
ring:qa-frontend
Senior Frontend QA Analyst for React/Next.js. Supports 5 modes — unit (default), accessibility, visual, e2e, performance. Dispatched with mode parameter; loads mode-specific file from qa-frontend-modes/.
ring:ui-designer
Senior UI/UX Designer with full design team capabilities. Produces specifications only — never implementation code. Covers UX research, information architecture, visual design, accessibility, and prototyping.
ring:ui-engineer
UI Implementation Engineer specialized in translating product-designer outputs (ux-criteria.md, user-flows.md, wireframes/) into production-ready React/Next.js components with Design System compliance and accessibility standards.
Design
Design analysis agent with preloaded mode skills. Modes: gap-analysis (completeness, architecture, security, performance, compliance, consistency, dependencies), design-review (anti-pattern detection).
ui-reviewer
Audit the design IMPLEMENTATION (rendered state coverage, copy usage, token usage in code, interaction fidelity, accessibility in code, component existence) — implementation-level only. System-level checks belong to design-auditor.