Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to KbWen/agent-virtual-office. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/KbWen/agent-virtual-office/main/.claude/agents/acx-reviewer.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/KbWen/agent-virtual-officeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/kbwen/agent-virtual-office/acx-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/kbwen/agent-virtual-office/acx-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/kbwen/agent-virtual-office/acx-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/kbwen/agent-virtual-office/acx-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/kbwen/agent-virtual-office/acx-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00038 | $0.00106 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00053 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00021 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00011 |
Grade A, and why
acx-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to acx-reviewer — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
Execute .agent/workflows/review.md verbatim. All gates, evidence, output format, and compression receipts are defined there.
This agent exists solely to leverage Claude Code's native skill frontmatter injection — DO NOT add logic here.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 12 lines · 38 tokens per session scan A 84998eb46e1e
acx-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository KbWen/agent-virtual-office (18 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 38 tokens to every session and 106 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to acx-reviewer, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
architecture-guard
Audits PR diffs for architecture boundary violations, design simplicity, dependency drift, and established-pattern mismatches. Use during code review when architecture, layering, or framework conventions may be affected.
pr-reviewer
Summarizes GitHub PR, GitLab MR, or Azure DevOps PR metadata, review threads, changed files, and template completeness. Use during review-ticket or code-review workflows when PR/MR context exists.
test-gap-finder
Finds missing, weak, or stale test coverage in a diff. Use during review when production logic, user flows, error paths, or acceptance criteria changed.
check
Code quality auditor for the Trellis channel runtime. Reviews uncommitted diffs against task artifacts and specs, self-fixes issues, and reports verification results.
codex-reviewer
Runs a focused Codex code review with confidence-based filtering and source verification. Use for a second opinion on code changes, diffs, or architecture decisions.
agent-cli-reviewer
Primary reviewer for the agent-facing CLI surface (ajh-tauri agent …) — CLI verbs, argv parsing, the agent.query/agent.result resources, allowlist projections and nested passthroughs, the machine-readable output contract, help/schema drift, throttling, and destructive-command ergonomics. Use for changes to…